Search for: "ROBERTS v. R&S WELL SERVICE" Results 301 - 320 of 531
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
8 Jun 2014, 2:42 pm by Stephen Bilkis
It was held in Robert J., Matter of Jose R., Matter of Benjamin L. and Matter of Jermaine G. that the overriding intent of the juvenile delinquency article is to empower Family Court to intervene and positively impact the lives of troubled young people while protecting the public. [read post]
18 Feb 2014, 8:12 am by Ira Lupu and Robert Tuttle
Elwood & Eleanor Davis Professor of Law Emeritus, and Robert W. [read post]
8 Jan 2014, 6:53 am by Joy Waltemath
Judge Lohier concurred in a separate opinion; Judge Raggi concurred in part and dissented in part (Matusick v Erie County Water Authority, January 6, 2014, Sack, R). [read post]
15 Aug 2013, 8:10 am
  My fear is that, as presently structured, "Elements of Law" is both too ambiguous to provide students with a sense of its place and value for their studies, and too marginal to suggest a valid reason for the use of precious faculty resources to service in a tightly structured first year curriculum. [read post]
6 Aug 2013, 3:24 pm by Ken White
Schmalfeldt also reported Stranahan to the Dallas Police, the FBI, the District Attorney, the Center for Missing and Exploited Children, and Texas Family Protective Services, apparently on the theory that Stranahan had once taken erotic potographs and (1) Stranahan wouldn't provide Schmalfeldt with releases and therefore must have taken pictures of underaged girls, and (2) Stranahan must be providing an unfit home for his family. [read post]
4 Jul 2013, 7:23 am by Bill Marler
” [3] As one noted expert observed, summarizing the history of these bacteria and their significance for public health, Although L. monocytogenes was recognized as an animal pathogen over 80 years ago, the first outbreak confirming an indirect transmission from animals to humans was reported only in 1983, in Canada’s Maritime provinces. [read post]
22 Jun 2013, 7:02 am by Benjamin Wittes
The book, edited and with a narrative introduction by Alan, is a collection of 114 of Lawfare‘s previously published posts on the 2011–2013 NDAAs and the Southern District of New York’s decision in Hedges v. [read post]
16 May 2013, 2:00 pm by Alan Rozenshtein
[r]egardless of the political consequences. [read post]
29 Apr 2013, 9:36 am by INFORRM
The Commission found that the presence of a well-known individual at the service “did not in any way lessen the newspaper’s obligation under Clause 5″: “The publication of images of Mr Hoy’s widow being comforted after the service represented a clear failure to handle publication sensitively, which was compounded by the publication of details of the eulogy. [read post]