Search for: "ROLLE v. USA"
Results 301 - 314
of 314
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Apr 2008, 8:21 am
Ford had appealed the jury's award, arguing that the punitive damage award was improper in light of the Supreme Court's ruling in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
12 Mar 2008, 8:19 am
Specifically, the question is, what does the Court of Appeal do when the US Supremes tells it to re-analyze a $55 million punitive damages award, already reduced twice, in light of Philip-Morris USA v. [read post]
17 Feb 2008, 7:06 pm
Conaster & USA v. [read post]
15 Feb 2008, 9:00 am
: (Spicy IP),USD 20 billion going off-patent: (Patent Circle),Canadian Prices Review Board asserts jurisdiction over products sold in US, but imported into Canada under Special Access Program: (Gowlings),Canadian Court of Appeal affirms decision allowing patent-owner to be joined to proceedings: Cobalt v Pfizer and Pharmascience v Pfizer: (Gowlings),PharmaStem appeals stem cell patent: asks for greater deference to patent examiners:… [read post]
14 Jan 2008, 7:03 am
Attorney's Office this morning, says this breaking story by Patsy Brumfield and Errol Castens in the Daily Journal.UPDATE: I've had a chance to pull all the current entries on the docket in USA v. [read post]
1 Jan 2008, 10:20 pm
Rosenruist-Gestao E Servicos LDA v. [read post]
7 Oct 2007, 5:05 am
Our prediction of winners: 1-1, against the spread 1-1ThursdayKentucky v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 4:29 pm
A later decision by the Ninth Circuit in Laws v. [read post]
31 Aug 2007, 4:09 am
The Ninth Circuit held that the failure to instruct ran afoul of the intervening decision in Philip Morris USA v. [read post]
3 Aug 2007, 9:09 am
Roll Call offers this breaking news report, regarding this opinion in USA v. [read post]
19 Jun 2007, 9:06 am
E.g., Lindsey v. [read post]
11 May 2007, 6:10 am
Teleflex"A unanimous Supreme Court rolled back the Federal Circuit's teaching, suggestion or motivation obviousness test in favor of the Court's prior, and substantially broader, test as set forth in Graham v. [read post]
16 Mar 2007, 10:35 am
Laeser,Contrary to your assertion, the State of Florida v. [read post]
1 Dec 2006, 5:09 am
Judge Filip has still not ruled on NAR's motion to dismiss USA must provide NAR, on a rolling basis, with a list of all MLS areas that the government intends to offer proof of anticompetitive effects resulting from the previous and/or revised ILD policies, but no later than October 16, 2006 USA has not agreed to refrain from challenging the technically outdated ILD policy that preceded the current ILD policy. [read post]
