Search for: "Ramsey v. Ramsey" Results 301 - 320 of 432
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
21 Feb 2011, 11:10 pm by So
Víctima de un sistema educativo patas para arriba, nunca me volví “hábil” con los números. [read post]
5 Feb 2010, 6:19 am by charonqc
As Mr Justice Ramsey noted: “Without any difficulty the dog was able to obtain a degree certificate and transcripts which were in identical form to those later produced by Joe Galloway – but with marks which, in fact, were better than those given to him“. [read post]
10 Jan 2011, 1:01 pm by Gritsforbreakfast
(Ross Ramsey at the Texas Tribune walks through all this in more detail, for those interested.)What does this mean for policing and corrections? [read post]
22 Jan 2023, 8:19 am by John Floyd
Supreme Court in June 1992 established the “Daubert Rule” in its landmark decision Daubert v. [read post]
11 Sep 2015, 1:00 am by Adebayo Lanlokun, Olswang LLP
Lord Hodge, with whom Lord Carnwath agreed, provided a dissenting judgment and specifically addressed the issue of retrospective assessment, citing the general principle stated in W T Ramsey Ltd v Inland Revenue Comrs [1981] UKHL 1 that, despite the fact that legislation to counter tax avoidance as a matter of sound policy may involve provisions with retroactive effect, this does not negate the need for clear and positive words as to the retrospective effect of the legislation. [read post]
11 Aug 2016, 3:41 pm by Rebecca Tushnet
  [I think this is a matter of leveraging reciprocity norms; Ramsey mentions guilt.] [read post]
12 Aug 2016, 10:30 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Ramsey: different remedy, like threats action? [read post]
22 Aug 2007, 11:50 am
Ga. 2002) (dismissing official capacity claims as "duplicative of the suit against the County"); Ramsey v. [read post]
19 Nov 2006, 9:31 pm
Carolyn Ramsey has "Intimate Homicide: Gender and Crime Control, 1880-1920," 77 Univ. [read post]
20 Aug 2006, 7:57 am
Ramsey, 431 U.S. 606, 616, 97 S.Ct. 1972, 52 L.Ed.2d 617 (1977)). [read post]
25 Jun 2022, 4:02 am by Rebecca Tushnet
Introduction:   Robert Burrell Australia/NZ is probably unusual b/c abandonment plays 3 distinct roles: (1) not a purely rhetorical device. 1863 case: from the moment you first use a TM, you have a property right—no goodwill, no reputation required. [read post]