Search for: "Reason v. Social Security Administration" Results 301 - 320 of 1,962
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
2 Sep 2013, 9:01 pm by Joanna L. Grossman
The Social Security Administration, for example, applies a place-of-residence rule when determining whether an individual can apply for benefits based a spouse’s earning records. [read post]
20 Aug 2013, 12:55 pm by Susan McLean
Put in place practical security measures for employees who have been approved to administrate/operate blogs and social media pages. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:58 am by NL
The only mechanisms for recovery are those set out in section 71 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
9 Dec 2010, 4:58 am by NL
The only mechanisms for recovery are those set out in section 71 of the Social Security Administration Act 1992. [read post]
22 May 2021, 2:46 pm
  The social events and legislative history leading to the enactment and promulgation of the NSL as a national law applied to the HKSAR under BL 18 have been summarised in HKSAR v Lai Chee Ying, ante. [read post]
19 Apr 2022, 12:37 pm by Bernard Bell
  Because the State Department performs both administrative and law enforcement functions, the Court ‘scrutinized with some skepticism the particular purpose claimed for disputed documents. [read post]
28 Feb 2021, 6:33 pm by Dennis Crouch
  That case is looking at whether administrative law judges deciding cases under the Social Security Act should have been appointed by the President Whether a claimant seeking disability benefits under the SSA forfeits an appointments-clause challenge to the appointment of an administrative law judge by failing to present that challenge during administrative proceedings. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-3134 : August 30, 2011 Judge: Shepherd Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Appellee applied for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1382. [read post]
4 Sep 2011, 7:15 am
AstrueCourt: U.S. 8th Circuit Court of Appeals Docket: 10-3134 : August 30, 2011 Judge: Shepherd Areas of Law: Civil Rights, Constitutional Law, Government & Administrative Law, Public Benefits Appellee applied for supplemental security income under Title XVI of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. 1382. [read post]
30 Mar 2022, 11:50 pm by Jon L. Gelman
 The court, in its decision, cited recent Social Security Rulings (SSR 00-3p) that obesity is to be considered in the course of an analysis of disability. [read post]
8 Sep 2021, 8:04 pm by Eric Goldman
Having taken action to secure the commercial benefit of the Facebook functionality, the appellants bear the legal consequences. [read post]