Search for: "Receivables Purchasing Co. v. R & R" Results 301 - 320 of 938
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
13 Apr 2016, 4:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
 For certain, simply receiving regular reports on a law firm’s cybersecurity risk management is no longer enough. [read post]
21 Mar 2016, 1:35 pm
Recently, the Florida Supreme Court case of Alachua County v. [read post]
17 Mar 2016, 4:51 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  If the corporation’s current policy limits are insufficient, excess policies can be purchased to increase the aggregate coverage (typically with the same terms as the underlying primary policy). [read post]
5 Mar 2016, 2:06 pm by Giles Peaker
“[T]he duty to account is a typical feature of the agent’s position” (Bowstead & Reynolds on Agency, 20th ed., at paragraph 1-032, citing Michelin Tyre Co Ltd v Macfarlane (Glasgow) Ltd [1917] 2 SLT 205); iv) In other respects, too, the usual incidents of agency were missing from the 2000 Agreement. [read post]
29 Feb 2016, 4:43 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Taylor, 782 F.3d 1142 (10th Cir. 2015); In re Merck & Co., Inc. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 4:36 pm by Kevin LaCroix
However, interest in purchasing this type of insurance did not develop until 1939, when in New York Dock Co. v. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
Court Denies Preliminary Injunction Sought by Removed LLC Manager Concord Development Co. [read post]
22 Feb 2016, 3:27 am by Peter Mahler
Court Denies Preliminary Injunction Sought by Removed LLC Manager Concord Development Co. [read post]
16 Feb 2016, 6:29 am by Eugene Volokh
An interesting case from a New Jersey family court, decided in August, but just released for publication earlier this month, D.G. v. [read post]
22 Jan 2016, 11:10 pm by James E. Novak, P.L.L.C.
Another purchase was set up, and as a result, the defendant’s co-defendant (another person charged in the crime) sold the meth to the agent. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 9:21 am by Thomas D. Nevins
” Cash & Henderson, 799 F.3d at 213 and at 209, quoting Volvo, 546 U.S. at 181, and Automatic Canteen Co. of Am. v. [read post]
18 Jan 2016, 3:48 am by Peter Mahler
As summed up by the judge in his decision last month in Carasso v Pauline J. [read post]