Search for: "Regina"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,755
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Mar 2008, 1:29 am
Regina v Rose (Kevin) Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “When calculating the benefit to a thief or handler of his acquisition or possession of criminal property, the market value of it was the amount it would have cost him to obtain the property legitimately, or the economic value to the loser, rather than what the thief or handler could get for the property if he sold it. [read post]
13 Jun 2007, 2:18 am
Monthly mass cycle rides require notice to police Regina (Kay) v. [read post]
22 May 2008, 3:18 am
Regina v B Court of Appeal “The Court of Appeal, Criminal Division, would not give the Crown leave to appeal unless it was seriously arguable, not that a judge in exercising his discretion or making his judgment in the course of a criminal trial might have decided differently, but that it was unreasonable for him to have done it in the way he had. [read post]
19 Oct 2007, 2:10 am
Preparation of heroin syringe does not constitute manslaughter Regina v. [read post]
2 Oct 2008, 9:20 am
Regina v O Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Those who prosecuted defendants charged with immigration offences who might be victims of people-trafficking must be aware of the protocols in relation to such victims enshrined in the Code for Crown Prosecutors; defence lawyers must make inquiries if there was credible material showing that their client might have been such a victim, especially if the client was young. [read post]
9 May 2007, 2:22 am
Minister’s legal aid refusal wrong Regina (Main) v. [read post]
6 Sep 2007, 12:39 am
Prisoner failing to return is not an escaper Regina v Montgomery Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Where a prisoner who was on temporary release from prison failed to return to prison at the expiry of his release period, he could not be said to have escaped from custody and could not therefore be guilty of the common-law offence of escape from custody. [read post]
15 Jun 2007, 6:48 am
Conspirators each liable for full compensation Regina v. [read post]
14 Feb 2008, 2:10 am
Regina v Xu and Others Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “Persons convicted of being concerned in the large scale commercial cultivation or production of cannabis, could expect to receive sentences with a starting point of three years if they acted as a gardener, six to seven years if they acted as an organiser, three to seven years if they acted as a manager and higher sentences where they controlled a large number of such operations. [read post]
15 Jun 2010, 2:09 am
Regina v George and others [2010] EWCA Crim 1148; [2010] WLR (D) 147 “Where a statute imposed criminal liability on an individual who dishonestly agreed with one or more other people to do a prohibited act, the intention and purpose was to criminalise that individual, regardless of whether those other persons were also dishonest. [read post]
8 Oct 2008, 8:34 am
Regina v K Court of Appeal “A barrister without chambers who was deemed to be practising but not subject to the disciplinary rules of the Bar's Code of Conduct was not entitled to provide immigration advice or services contrary to sections 84 and 91 of the Immigration and Asylum Act 1999. [read post]
3 Oct 2008, 8:33 am
Regina v Al-Ali Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “On an application by the prosecution for leave to appeal from a ruling of a trial judge in the crown court, the Court of Appeal should not simply consider whether the appeal had a realistic prospect of success because even if the judge's ruling was wrong it would only be if it were in the interests of justice that the trial should be resumed or started afresh. [read post]
16 Oct 2007, 1:47 am
Elements of outraging public decency Regina v Hamilton Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “The two-person rule applicable to the common-law offence of outraging public decency was capable of being satisfied if there were two or more persons present who were capable of seeing the nature of the act even if they did not actually see it. [read post]
1 May 2007, 1:53 am
Regina v. [read post]
30 Oct 2007, 3:16 am
Judge's case management decision can be appealed Regina v Clark Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “A refusal by a trial judge to order an adjournment before trial, or indeed at any time before the start of the summing-up, was a case management decision which could constitute a terminating ruling against which a prosecutor could appeal. [read post]
26 Nov 2008, 10:07 am
Regina v Moulden Court of Appeal (Criminal Division) “The words ‘proceedings before the crown court’ in section 6(2)(a) of the Proceeds of Crime Act 2002 meant proceedings under a single indictment. [read post]
20 Jun 2007, 1:07 am
Jury understands ’significant’ Regina v. [read post]
28 Jun 2007, 2:30 am
Notification was note required Regina v. [read post]
27 Sep 2022, 7:24 am
And Salve Regina University has posted on YouTube a video titled “Supreme Court Justice Elena Kagan visits Salve Regina University. [read post]
7 Dec 2009, 3:00 pm
When not in foster care Regina and her siblings experienced evictions, homelessness and homeless shelters. [read post]
