Search for: "Robert Clements"
Results 301 - 320
of 565
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
20 Apr 2012, 11:42 am
Clement of the Washington law firm of Bancroft PLLC. [read post]
16 Apr 2012, 2:15 pm
CHIEF JUSTICE ROBERTS: Is that the normal procedure? [read post]
9 Apr 2012, 6:10 am
The Washington Post’s Robert Barnes explains the rhetorical power of Lochner v. [read post]
8 Apr 2012, 2:11 am
Module two of the Leveson Inquiry, examining the relationship between the police and the press, drew to a close this week with evidence from the former and current Director of Public Prosecutions, and former News of the World employees Lucy Panton and Neil Wallis. [read post]
4 Apr 2012, 7:42 am
” And at the Atlantic, Andrew Cohen discusses what he characterizes as an inconsistency between the arguments that Paul Clement made last week on the individual mandate and those that he is making this week defending the Defense of Marriage Act in the First Circuit. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 2:30 pm
The Supreme Court appointed a third party, Washington D.C. lawyer Robert Long, to argue the position that the Court has no jurisdiction to hear the case because of the Anti-Injunction Act. [read post]
3 Apr 2012, 8:08 am
No, it wasn't either of the lead lawyers Paul Clement or Donald Verrilli Jr. making this assessment. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 5:35 pm
CLEMENT: Well, with respect, Mr. [read post]
2 Apr 2012, 8:36 am
Chief Justice John Roberts and Justice Kennedy both observed that upholding the individual mandate would fundamentally change the government’s relationship with individuals.Click here for a complete copy of the Update. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 9:53 am
" But Chief Justice John Roberts was not so happy. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 8:53 am
In some corners, it’s more important to reconcile one’s claims with the writings of John Rawls than the opinions of John Roberts. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:56 pm
If he is among the majority, Chief Justice John Roberts will assign a justice, probably himself, to write the opinion for the majority. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 2:26 pm
One thing is certain – after Citizens United, the institutional legitimacy of the Supreme Court, not to mention the legacy of John Roberts and Anthony Kennedy is very much on the line. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 11:53 am
(Chief Justice Roberts). 2. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 9:29 am
As expected, the “liberal” justices pounced on Paul Clement’s central argument. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 8:43 am
Roberts, who was thought to be in play, was more ambiguous, but he tore into the government's positions over and over again with energy. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 7:06 am
Justices Roberts and Alito principally emphasized this mismatch in the Government’s theory, (see, e.g., Tr. 31:24-34:22), and Mike Carvin returned to the point in direct response to Justice Kennedy’s final question about the issue, (id. [read post]
29 Mar 2012, 1:30 am
Clement is addressing the justices and not the folks watching the argument. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 8:25 pm
Roberts and Scalia scuffle with him and suddenly Alito comes to the rescue with a great hypothetical: Let's say Congress says this to the States: We have got great news for you. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 3:56 pm
Roberts, Jr., allowed the argument to run 25 minutes beyond the scheduled hour. [read post]
