Search for: "Rodger "Doe"
Results 301 - 320
of 441
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
5 Jul 2011, 9:00 am
This case, while the Court did vacate the State Court's ruling, does not change this rule. [read post]
4 Jul 2011, 12:39 am
… and don’t forget to take a look at our recent posts: Hockeysticks: Climategate Unit told by Information Commissioner to produce weather data July 2, 2011 David Hart QC Where in the world does the Human Rights Act apply? [read post]
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am
Beginning with sad news, Lord Alan Rodger of Earlsferry, one of the justices of the Supreme Court, died yesterday. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 7:13 pm
Scott Greenfield, with whom I occasionally disagree, but for whom I really do have a great deal of respect, writes a provocative post — I know, I know: you’d like me to tell you something new. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 7:00 am
Neither Turner pr Rodgers was represented by counsel. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 3:53 am
But does that qualify her to guide lawyers to success? [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm
The stay does not apply to the other two rules and does not extend the compliance deadlines for any of the four rules. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 10:01 am
But what the hell is this, and why does it get an encyclopedia article? [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm
It is submitted that it probably does not, but that the excessively vague drafting of Šilih does not allow for certainty on this point. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:01 am
citizens if the U.S. does not honor the treaty. [read post]
7 Jun 2011, 1:38 pm
He does not need to resign. [read post]
3 Jun 2011, 3:38 am
S 64(1A) appears to confer a discretion: “Where—(a) fingerprints, impressions of footwear or samples are taken from a person in connection with the investigation of an offence, and (b) subsection (3) below does not require them to be destroyed, the fingerprints, impressions of footwear or samples may be retained after they have fulfilled the purposes for which they were taken but shall not be used by any person except for purposes related to the prevention or detection of crime,… [read post]
2 Jun 2011, 2:59 am
"It does mean getting some meaningful increases over the next few years to get our base up above where it is today. [read post]
30 May 2011, 11:37 pm
Lord Rodger alone dissented. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am
The effect of this is that the claimant in cases of single exposure does not need to show that the defendant’s breach of duty doubled the risk of developing the disease, and needs only to show that it materially increased the risk to the claimant of contracting mesothelioma. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:00 pm
Does this matter? [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am
In the Supreme Court the majority (Lord Phillips, Lord Hope, Lady Hale, Lord Kerr and Lord Clarke) preferred a broader construction than the minority (Lord Judge, Lord Brown, Lord Rodger and Lord Walker) would have adopted. [read post]
10 May 2011, 4:05 pm
The Ninth Circuit, however, clarified that this requirement “does not apply to proposed intervenors in federal-question cases when the proposed intervenor is not raising new claims. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:17 pm
Does the Constitution really allow parties without standing to become parties so long as they're attached to an existing party? [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:17 am
Check out the posts which created the biggest buzz: Life as a One-Man Band Should a Solo Buy Law Practice Management Software What Role Does Your Spouse or Partner Play in the Success of Your Solo Practice? [read post]
