Search for: "Rodgers v. Rodgers" Results 301 - 320 of 474
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Jun 2011, 9:20 am by Melina Padron
Beginning with sad news, Lord Alan Rodger of Earlsferry, one of the justices of the Supreme Court, died yesterday. [read post]
22 Jun 2011, 1:40 pm by WIMS
"       On February 23, 2011, in response to Federal court orders in Sierra Club v. [read post]
12 Jun 2011, 11:30 pm by Matthew Hill
The families argued that Re McKerr had been rendered obsolete by the recent Strasbourg decision of Šilih v Slovenia (2009) 49 E.H.R.R. 37. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 8:01 am by Steve Hall
  The case echoes the dispute involved in the 2008 Supreme Court decision in Medellin v. [read post]
24 May 2011, 8:40 am by Cathyrn Hopkins, Olswang LLP
On 9 March 2011, the Supreme Court handed down its judgment in the joint appeal of Sienkiewicz v Grief (UK) Ltd; Knowsley MBC v Willmore [2011] UKSC 10. [read post]
23 May 2011, 10:00 pm by Rosalind English
Famous examples are R v Director of Public Prosecutions, Ex p Kebilene [2000] 2 AC 326 , R (L) v Commissioner of Police of the Metropolis [2010] 1 AC 410 and Ghaidan v Godin-Mendoza [2004] UKHL 30. [read post]
23 May 2011, 8:44 am by Edward Craven, Matrix Chambers.
This was the riddle that recently occupied a nine-judge panel of the Supreme Court in R (Adams) v Secretary of State for Justice [2011] UKSC 18. [read post]
18 May 2011, 5:07 am by Rosalind English
These guidelines were challenged under Article 8  in the joined appeals R (S) v Chief Constable of the South Yorkshire Police and R (Marper) v Chief Constable of South Yorkshire Police [2004] 1 WLR 2196. [read post]
9 May 2011, 12:17 pm
  Ditto for Ds.Now, it may be that Rodgers in fact has standing; I don't know. [read post]
2 May 2011, 8:17 am by Susan Cartier Liebel
Richard Maseles provided Real World Legal Research, v. 2.0, the extended cut and Canned research- finding what someone’s already done (2.0) in Real World Legal Research. [read post]
3 Apr 2011, 11:31 pm by Blog Editorial
Second, on 6 and 7 April 2011, Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker, Mance and Clarke will hear Jivraj v Hashwani. [read post]
31 Mar 2011, 9:50 am by Kathryn Noble, Olswang
Supreme Court The main issue for the Supreme Court (Lords Phillips, Rodger, Collins, Clarke and Dyson) to decide was whether the First and Second Complaints were based on the same grounds, such that the general principle that the same cause should not be brought against somebody twice (nemo debet bis vexari pro una et eadem causa) was engaged. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 2:35 am by Audrey Ah-Kan, Olswang
The appeal is due to be heard by Lords Phillips, Rodger, Walker, Mance and Clarke. [read post]
27 Mar 2011, 3:29 am by Blog Editorial
On Monday 28 March, Peter Stewart v The Queen will be heard by Lord Rodger, Lady Hale, Lords Brown, Kerr and Dyson. [read post]