Search for: "Rollings v. Smith" Results 301 - 320 of 424
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
17 Jul 2011, 5:20 pm by INFORRM
Modi v Clarke, heard 22 June 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Thomas and Moses LJJ). [read post]
10 Jul 2011, 5:41 pm by INFORRM
Modi v Clarke, heard 22 June 2011 (Master of the Rolls, Thomas and Moses LJJ). [read post]
5 Jul 2011, 1:44 pm
There were two pieces of prior art over which the patents were claimed to be obvious: the first was a paper referred to as Parmley & Smith, and the second was a conference paper delivered by Professor Smith (of Parmley & Smith fame) in Banbury. [read post]
29 Jun 2011, 2:57 pm by Erik J. Heels
LawLawLaw includes my observations on trends in technology, IP law (trademarks, domain names, and patents), baseball (long story), and rock 'n' roll (longer story). [read post]
19 Jun 2011, 8:01 am by David Smith
First, strictly temporally, is David Smith's version, followed by Dave's]Whittaker v Kinnear [2011] EWHC 1479 (QB)This case raises some interesting questions about estoppel and sale.K sold her property and it’s grounds to W and his business associate, Mr Nichols in 2007, apparently because she could no longer afford it. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 7:32 am by Michael M. O'Hear
  Earlier this week, the Court granted certiorari in Smith v. [read post]
15 Jun 2011, 12:47 pm by Michael O'Hear
  Earlier this week, the Court granted certiorari in Smith v. [read post]
9 Jun 2011, 12:18 pm
Since then the AmeriKat has watched helplessly as not one, not two, but three patent decisions rolled out of the US Supreme Court over the past few days. [read post]
23 May 2011, 2:20 am by Kelly
(Spicy IP) DIPP releases discussion paper on utility models (Spicy IP) Israel The USTR’s rite of Spring – Special 301 Report (America-Israel Patent Law) Mexico Forged alcohol beverages receive more than a hangover (IP tango) Netherlands Human rights trump design rights – District Court of The Hague lifts ex parte injunction against artist in Nadja Plesner v Louis Vuitton (IPKat) (Class 99) District Court of The Hague invalidates Fritsch’s patent relating to an… [read post]
13 Apr 2011, 8:14 am by Francis Davey
The idea appears to have been widely accepted — for example it was argued by counsel in Cardwell v Lucas (1836) 2 Meeson and Welsby 111 150 E.R. 691 and upheld by yhe Court of Exchequer in Gandy v Jubber (1865) 5 Best and Smith 15 122 E.R. 914. [read post]
7 Apr 2011, 1:16 pm by Bexis
  563 A.2d at 126-27.Numerous other courts throughout the country have held, similarly to Smith v. [read post]
28 Mar 2011, 4:58 am by Kelly
” Despite my eye rolls, apparently these ads are successful in attracting taxpayers. [read post]