Search for: "Roper v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 424
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Oct 2012, 1:23 am
Price, Roper, Majeski, Kohn & Bentley, 183 Cal. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 7:09 am
In State v. [read post]
15 Nov 2011, 4:05 pm
In 2008, the Sixth Circuit found in Phelps-Roper v Strickland (22 August 2008) that a similar law to those struck down this year was valid. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 10:48 pm
Dist., but that a decision like Roper v. [read post]
4 Jan 2011, 4:18 pm
" Twice in recent years the United States Supreme Court has affirmed the constitutionality of JLWOP for murder cases, first in the Roper v Simmons decision in 2005, then in 2010's Graham v Florida decision. [read post]
12 Dec 2022, 9:14 am
In October 2004, Congress passed and President Bush signed into law the Scott Campbell, Stephanie Roper, Wendy Preston, Louarna Gillis, and Nila Lynn Crime Victims' Rights Act (CVRA). [read post]
10 Jul 2015, 12:41 pm
Alabama, Roper v. [read post]
13 Aug 2012, 8:41 am
Rumsfeld (2004), Roper v. [read post]
2 Aug 2010, 2:18 pm
Rumsfeld, and, of course, Roper v. [read post]
17 Jan 2012, 9:30 pm
McBride, Hammer v. [read post]
3 May 2010, 12:24 pm
Virginia (2002)) and juveniles (Roper v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:24 pm
Kentucky Issue: Whether a juvenile under the age of eighteen at the time of his offense is entitled to a new sentencing hearing in light of Roper v. [read post]
6 Oct 2010, 3:00 am
California, Roper v. [read post]
2 Feb 2009, 8:55 pm
But it is nothing like a guarantee that the court will agree to hear it.On the other hand, the question of whether life without parole for juveniles is constitutional is the logical next step following the court's 2005 decision in Roper v. [read post]
14 Nov 2014, 5:42 am
Farina, 13-1227, a state-on-top habeas case involving how much leeway a federal court is allowed in determining that a state court made an unreasonable factual determination; and Whitman v. [read post]
4 Oct 2019, 9:21 am
EduCap, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
" State v. [read post]
4 Nov 2007, 8:33 pm
" State v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:42 am
It's for this reason that every state restricts children from such consequential actions as voting, serving on juries, purchasing alcohol or marrying without parental consent.The Supreme Court recognized the differences between teenagers and adults when it held a few years ago, in Roper v. [read post]
25 Jun 2008, 9:01 pm
Virginia, 2002), and murder by a minor (Roper v. [read post]
