Search for: "Roper v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 423
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
3 Nov 2009, 1:01 pm
More on Roper v. [read post]
2 Nov 2009, 12:24 pm
Frederick (the BONG HITS 4 JESUS student free expression case), Roper v. [read post]
30 Oct 2009, 7:14 am
And at ACSblog, Charles Ogletree (who submitted an amicus brief on behalf of petitioners in the cases) urges the Court to affirm the reasoning put forth in Roper v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:42 am
It's for this reason that every state restricts children from such consequential actions as voting, serving on juries, purchasing alcohol or marrying without parental consent.The Supreme Court recognized the differences between teenagers and adults when it held a few years ago, in Roper v. [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 9:09 am
[See pp. 165-204, on Vásquez.] [read post]
23 Oct 2009, 6:49 am
Graham and Sullivan argue that the imposition of a life sentence on a minor violates the Eighth Amendment, in light of the Court's ruling in Roper v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 4:58 pm
This could be the most important case since Roper on the use of constitutional comparativism. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:59 pm
Even Scalia saw, in his dissent in Roper v. [read post]
6 Oct 2009, 2:09 pm
In Roper v. [read post]
25 Sep 2009, 1:02 am
In Snyder v. [read post]
15 Sep 2009, 8:06 pm
Even more significant in retrospect is the Court's 2005 holding in Roper v. [read post]
14 Sep 2009, 2:24 pm
Kentucky Issue: Whether a juvenile under the age of eighteen at the time of his offense is entitled to a new sentencing hearing in light of Roper v. [read post]
27 Aug 2009, 3:27 am
Sullivan and Graham, though, work the juvenile angle, building off Roper v. [read post]
23 Aug 2009, 6:26 pm
Emboldened by the Supreme Court's Roper v. [read post]
12 Aug 2009, 2:14 am
It's a post about who we are.And it's about slippery slopes.It was just three years ago, in Roper v. [read post]
2 Aug 2009, 6:12 pm
The Supreme Court sent an important message when it ruled in Roper v. [read post]
29 Jul 2009, 2:24 am
Others have brought (or threatened to bring) felony charges for sexting (see here and here and, self-referentially, here, for instance).And then there's the matter of punishment.In Roper v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 7:07 am
LINKThe Supreme Court sent an important message when it ruled in Roper v. [read post]
28 Jul 2009, 1:54 am
Here's how the op-ed opens: The Supreme Court sent an important message when it ruled in Roper v. [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 9:22 pm
He has argued, usually successfully, in some of the most important cases of the last decade: Boumediene, Roper, McConnell v. [read post]
