Search for: "S.C., Matter of" Results 301 - 320 of 959
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
18 Jul 2016, 5:43 am by Heather Mac Donald
But contrary to the Black Lives Matter narrative, there is no government agency more dedicated to the proposition that black lives matter than the police. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 10:45 am
These are lives that matter to families, friends, and communities, and they should matter to you too. [read post]
19 Jun 2016, 9:04 am by John Mastoras
The claim involved allegations that the University failed to satisfy requirements of the Employment Insurance Premium Reduction Program (“EIPRP”) governed by the Employment Insurance Act, S.C. 1996, c. 23. [read post]
11 May 2016, 4:00 am by Tracy Coenen
Those clients can be divided further according to the industries in which they specialize or the types of matters in which they’re involved. [read post]
14 Apr 2016, 6:20 am by Sarah M Donnelly
action=current&sub=view_lateral&job_id=115 Legal Strategies for a Changing Environment Godfrey & Kahn, S.C. is an equal employment opportunity employer functioning under an affirmative action plan. [read post]
19 Mar 2016, 12:40 pm by Gregory Forman
It further noted that one of the factors in equitable distribution, “the income of each spouse, the earning potential of each spouse, and the opportunity for future acquisition of capital assets,” (S.C. [read post]
28 Jan 2016, 7:03 am by Camilla Alexandra Hrdy
As Lemley put it in his 2008 article, "the secrecy requirement"––that is, the fact that trade secrets can be obtained only for fully secret subject matter––"channels particular inventors to the form of IP protection that best achieves the goals of society. [read post]
19 Jan 2016, 1:59 pm by Michael Markarian
., Lindsay Graham, R-S.C., Chris Coons, D-Del., and Robert Menendez, D-N.J., and Reps. [read post]
13 Dec 2015, 1:04 pm
In Re Jacobson, 240 S.C. 436, 448 (1962)  Inside lawyers are still lawyers. [read post]
30 Nov 2015, 3:35 am
Robinson, 396 S.C. 577, 722 S.E.2d 820 (South Carolina Supreme Court 2012). [read post]
10 Oct 2015, 10:23 pm by Patricia Salkin
Under federal law and the Richland County, S.C., Code § 8–62(h), development was generally not permitted in a regulatory floodway. [read post]