Search for: "SCOTUS RULING"
Results 301 - 320
of 6,868
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
23 Jul 2023, 3:53 pm
23 Jul 2023, 12:34 pm
Geographical IndicationsAnastasiia Kyrylenko brought to us an analysis of the General Court’s ruling in T-34/22, which found that the European Commission is not bound by the earlier assessment of national authorities when examining applications for geographical indications. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 10:32 am
On the plus side, linking the statutory terms to “aiding-and-abetting” does seemingly import some beneficial language from the SCOTUS Twitter v. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:42 am
If the tables were turned, the left would be ecstatic to have SCOTUS pull rulings they prefer out of its collective butt. [read post]
21 Jul 2023, 4:00 am
Craig and Steve discuss SCOTUS, these rulings, and long-term impact of these decisions. [read post]
20 Jul 2023, 6:00 am
The panel did not rule outright for the District. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 8:23 pm
The New York Times Opinion – “The headlines that emerged from the 2022-23 term of the Supreme Court conveyed the brutal impact of several big decisions, but they sometimes missed the human elements that made these opinions so startling — how the conservative majority favored one oppressed group but not another or imposed conflicting rules on who can bring a case. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
In the 1984 ruling in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 11:15 am
In the 1984 ruling in Chevron, U.S.A., Inc. v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 2:30 am
Williams.The first paragraph should whet your appetite for more:In landmark rulings, the US Supreme Court significantly restricted race-conscious admissions policies in higher education, a [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 4:30 pm
As we previously blogged about, SCOTUS held that the FAA preempted California’s rule preventing courts from dividing PAGA actions. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 3:27 pm
Supreme Court.In this excerpt from the show, Dreeben discusses the rightward shift of the Supreme Court and the justices’ high-profile rulings from the 2022-2023 term on issues including race, LGBTQ+ rights, and student loans.In the full episode, Dreeben breaks down:– Justice Ketanji Brown Jackson’s impact during her first term on the Court;– Dissenting opinions written by Justices Sotomayor and Kagan, which they read aloud from the bench; and– Cases on the… [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 12:27 pm
SCOTUS held, by a 6-3 majority, that “the First Amendment prohibits Colorado from forcing a website designer to create expressive designs speaking messages with which the designer disagrees” – specifically, websites for same-sex marriages. [read post]
18 Jul 2023, 7:43 am
Here’s the Tuesday morning read: Alabama Republicans reject call for 2nd majority Black district, despite Supreme Court ruling (Kim Chandler, The Associated Press) Plaintiffs ask US Supreme Court to temporarily halt Microsoft, Activision merger (John Kruzel, Reuters) California Supreme Court rejects SCOTUS decision, keeps state labor law alive (Bob Egelko, San Francisco Chronicle) How the Supreme Court put itself in charge of the executive branch (Ian Millhiser, Vox) Is… [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:40 pm
Bad Spaniels (L), Jack Daniel's (R) ...Whereas the District Court had initially found in favour of Jack Daniel’s, rejecting VIP's nominative fair use and First Amendment defences, the Ninth Circuit, on appeal, reversed the District Court’s decision in favour of VIP Products, ruling that (as previously reported by the IPKat):Bad Spaniels was an “expressive work” protected by the First Amendment; andthat there was no dilution of Jack Daniel’s trademarks… [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 2:37 pm
“California Supreme Court rejects SCOTUS decision, keeps state labor law alive”: Bob Egelko of The San Francisco Chronicle has this report on a 7-to-0 ruling that the Supreme Court of California issued today. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 11:58 am
Untended Consequence: Pressure on the “Sincerely Held Religious Belief” Requirement If you were to canvass religious discrimination case law around the country, there is one pattern that stands out (other than the now-rejected de minimus rule): courts have avoided (like Covid exposure in 2020) the question of whether the employee’s accommodation request is based on a “sincerely held religious belief,” as required by law. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:10 am
On balance, progressives should be grateful for President Trump's not-so-conservative SCOTUS picks. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 6:30 am
Denounces Recent SCOTUS Rulings first appeared on Le·gal In·sur·rec·tion. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
A federal district court recently ruled that claims against the sheriff, his deputies, and the county can proceed. [read post]
