Search for: "SEC CORPORATION v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 905
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
13 Jul 2017, 5:31 am
Khouri (State Taxation – Tobacco)Wilson v. [read post]
11 May 2008, 9:17 am
United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 6:29 am
Blass, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Tuesday, February 18, 2025 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Schedule 13G, SEC, shareholder engagement Granting Favors: Insider-Driven Corporate Philanthropy Posted by Leeor Ofer (Harvard Law School), on Tuesday, February 18, 2025 Tags: Board of Directors, Philanthropy, S&P500, Shareholders Corporate Governance Trends in the United States Posted by Rich Fields, Melissa Martin, and Rusty… [read post]
21 Feb 2025, 6:29 am
Blass, Sullivan & Cromwell LLP, on Tuesday, February 18, 2025 Tags: Compliance and disclosure interpretation, Schedule 13G, SEC, shareholder engagement Granting Favors: Insider-Driven Corporate Philanthropy Posted by Leeor Ofer (Harvard Law School), on Tuesday, February 18, 2025 Tags: Board of Directors, Philanthropy, S&P500, Shareholders Corporate Governance Trends in the United States Posted by Rich Fields, Melissa Martin, and Rusty… [read post]
23 May 2011, 7:57 am
In the criminal context, DPAs typically involve the government filing a formal charging document, usually an information, as well as the DPA with the appropriate court; NPAs typically do not involve the courts and the agreements are maintained by the parties.[9] Historically, the SEC resolved settled enforcement actions by filing consent judgments based on civil complaints in a United States District Court or an administrative order instituting proceedings and… [read post]
27 Mar 2010, 1:59 pm
United States, Dkt. [read post]
3 Jul 2017, 7:09 am
HCSB Financial Corporation, et al., No. 4:17-cv-1589 (D.S.C. [read post]
16 Dec 2014, 4:13 am
The Newman and Chiasson Case In United States v. [read post]
26 Jun 2017, 6:23 am
Energy United States, L.L.C., 720 F.3d 620 (5th Cir. 2013) Daniel Berman v. [read post]
13 Aug 2010, 6:14 am
The United States District Court for the Southern District of California granted summary judgment in favor of the SEC on its claim under Section 5 of the 1934 Act for selling unregistered securities and on its Section 10(b) claim based on the August 2000 press release. [read post]
6 May 2009, 6:38 am
Cir. 2000) (applying SEC v. [read post]
7 May 2023, 9:05 pm
Though most of the action has occurred in Europe, ESG is gaining significance in the United States as well. [read post]
31 Jan 2019, 2:03 pm
As described below, state, federal and international breach notification laws arguably do not apply to ransomware attacks because no corporate data is actually pilfered. [read post]
10 Apr 2010, 2:45 pm
United States, Dkt. [read post]
21 Apr 2011, 7:56 pm
On April 1, 2011, in United States v. [read post]
29 Nov 2009, 6:12 pm
V. [read post]
28 Jun 2010, 11:28 am
In Edmond v. [read post]
12 May 2021, 5:57 am
In this case, the panel said, it was clear that the defendants became irrevocably liable to deliver shares in Boston, Massachusetts (SEC v. [read post]
6 Jun 2007, 9:55 am
Nomination of Directors Last year's AFSCME v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 11:17 am
The United States District Court for the Northern District of California granted the motion. [read post]
