Search for: "SEIZURE OF ONE SMITH "
Results 301 - 320
of 652
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
17 Nov 2014, 6:24 am
The district court denied Jones's motion to suppress the GPS evidence, finding that one `”traveling in an automobile on public thoroughfares has no reasonable expectation of privacy in his movements from one place to another. [read post]
11 Nov 2014, 9:01 pm
The two cases in which the Court announced this principle are Smith v. [read post]
7 Nov 2014, 1:37 pm
Smith v. [read post]
4 Nov 2014, 10:59 am
Bradley Smith of Arnold & Smith, PLLC answers the question “Can I be arrested without evidence against me? [read post]
26 Oct 2014, 8:23 pm
The Code of Hammourabi, promulgated by the King of Babylon around 1760 BC, is one of the first examples of the codification of law, presented to the public and applying to the acts of the ruler. [read post]
24 Oct 2014, 3:05 pm
(And another in Smith v. [read post]
15 Oct 2014, 3:39 pm
Smith, 263 F.3d 571, 586 (6th Cir. 2001). [read post]
5 Oct 2014, 9:01 pm
All these trifling seizures add up. [read post]
30 Sep 2014, 8:47 am
North Carolina, in which the Court will consider “whether a reasonable mistake of law can create cause for a Fourth Amendment search or seizure”; “the defendant,” Kerr argues, “has the better argument that the answer is ‘no. [read post]
11 Sep 2014, 4:00 pm
Under the Supreme Court’s decision in Smith v. [read post]
4 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
Smith (In re Smith), 207 B.R. 26, 30 (Bankr. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
Enjaian claims Sergeant Dorta's actions violated his 4rth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 3:51 pm
NSA and Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:25 am
Between April 2010 and January 2011, Appellee filed eight separate pro se petitions in Philadelphia under the name Mark Wallace, or one of his aliases, Mark Green or James Smith, seeking destruction of fingerprints, photographs, and arrest records from past charges that had not resulted in convictions. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
Smith (1990) condemned the strict scrutiny test in religious exemption cases? [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:19 am
” Whether a corporation qualifies as a “person” capable of exercising religion is an inquiry one cannot answer without reference to the “full body” of pre-Smith “free-exercise caselaw. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:07 am
A few things struck me about the Court’s ruling: One, the phone in Wurie was a flip phone, while the one in Riley was a smart phone. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
Davis that people have an expectation of privacy in “even one point of cell site location data. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
The conviction and sentence were vacated because the seizure violated the Fourth Amendment under Terry v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:42 am
Smith, 263 F.3d 571 (U.S. [read post]
