Search for: "SEIZURE OF ONE SMITH "
Results 301 - 320
of 643
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
4 Sep 2014, 8:00 am
Smith (In re Smith), 207 B.R. 26, 30 (Bankr. [read post]
1 Aug 2014, 5:31 am
Enjaian claims Sergeant Dorta's actions violated his 4rth Amendment right to be free from unreasonable search and seizure. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 3:51 pm
NSA and Smith v. [read post]
25 Jul 2014, 11:25 am
Between April 2010 and January 2011, Appellee filed eight separate pro se petitions in Philadelphia under the name Mark Wallace, or one of his aliases, Mark Green or James Smith, seeking destruction of fingerprints, photographs, and arrest records from past charges that had not resulted in convictions. [read post]
8 Jul 2014, 9:38 am
Smith (1990) condemned the strict scrutiny test in religious exemption cases? [read post]
30 Jun 2014, 7:19 am
” Whether a corporation qualifies as a “person” capable of exercising religion is an inquiry one cannot answer without reference to the “full body” of pre-Smith “free-exercise caselaw. [read post]
26 Jun 2014, 8:07 am
A few things struck me about the Court’s ruling: One, the phone in Wurie was a flip phone, while the one in Riley was a smart phone. [read post]
24 Jun 2014, 2:18 pm
Davis that people have an expectation of privacy in “even one point of cell site location data. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 12:25 pm
The conviction and sentence were vacated because the seizure violated the Fourth Amendment under Terry v. [read post]
16 Jun 2014, 5:42 am
Smith, 263 F.3d 571 (U.S. [read post]
3 Jun 2014, 7:32 am
At Oral Argument Defense Argument The seizure of Castagnola’s computer and the exploratory search of that computer was completely unreasonable. [read post]
12 May 2014, 7:47 am
United States (seizure of property during war)). [read post]
9 May 2014, 12:28 am
As Hannibal Smith says in The A-Team “I love it when a plan comes together”. [read post]
5 May 2014, 1:05 pm
In short, she and others like Stewart have failed to come to grips with the following distinction between what was upheld in Smith and the unprecedented NSA bulk data seizure program: a particular seizure vs. a general or undiscriminating one. [read post]
30 Apr 2014, 4:30 am
Some day, Hollingsworth or one of the luminaries on that defense team will be able to author an entire hornbook on all of the issues that have cropped up in that litigation. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 11:01 am
In short, she and others like Stewart have failed to come to grips with the following distinction between what was upheld in Smith and the unprecedented NSA bulk data seizure program: a particular seizure vs. a general or undiscriminating one. [read post]
28 Apr 2014, 4:20 am
Good one, Stew. [read post]
20 Apr 2014, 12:14 pm
MIKE SMITH, JOHN DOES 1-100, JANE DOES 1-100, XYZ COMPANY, Defendants. [read post]
16 Apr 2014, 5:22 am
Court § 371 . . . dated between [January], 2014, to the present, including emails referring or relating to a government investigation involving any or all of the following: [Redacted list of names of companies and individuals in the form of `John Smith, John Smith, Inc., any current or former John Smith employees, etc. [read post]
10 Apr 2014, 6:10 am
The defense briefs focus instead on Chimel, arguing for a rule of seizure but no searches without a warrant. [read post]
