Search for: "SMITH v. DEPARTMENT OF JUSTICE" Results 301 - 320 of 1,293
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Apr 2012, 12:00 am
Judge Jerry Smith of the Fifth Circuit Court of Appeals went so far as to lecture a Department of Justice lawyer about judicial power, ordering the lawyer to write the court a three-page memo explaining the court’s power to strike down statutes. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 12:00 am by Alan Z. Rozenshtein
Earlier today, the Supreme Court issued its opinion in Counterman v. [read post]
9 Nov 2007, 8:00 am
Opinion below (Seventh Circuit) Petition for certiorari Brief in opposition __________________ Docket: 07-360 Case name: Smith v. [read post]
13 Jun 2023, 7:07 pm by Anna Bower
On Smith’s side of the courtroom, for the Justice Department, it’s David Harbach of the special counsel’s office. [read post]
9 Dec 2011, 7:47 am by Marissa Miller
Smith at this blog reports on Monday’s oral argument in Messerschmidt v. [read post]
10 May 2018, 7:57 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Karen Smith et al, challenging the state law’s definition of death filed on behalf of Israel Stinson’s mother, Jonee Fonseca, and Life Legal Defense Foundation by the Pacific Justice Institute. [read post]
29 Jan 2007, 3:02 am
According to the Department of Justice, there is "no longer any live genuine controversy to adjudicate. [read post]
21 Oct 2009, 8:13 am
  The Justices will consider Defense Department v. [read post]
23 Jan 2018, 4:33 am by Edith Roberts
Smith, which asks who should pay attorney’s fees in successful civil-rights cases brought on behalf of prisoners, and Marinello v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 4:17 pm by INFORRM
Pending CJEU copyright cases: Several copyright references are pending in the EU Court of Justice. [read post]
1 Jan 2018, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Pending CJEU copyright cases More copyright references are pending in the EU Court of Justice. [read post]
4 Sep 2013, 9:41 am by Josh Blackman, guest-blogging
After considering views from the various government departments, cabinet secretaries, and the Justice Department, the Solicitor General’s office “made a judgment to stay where we were. [read post]
16 Apr 2018, 8:02 pm by Ronald Mann
The justices’ second argument this morning was WesternGeco v Ion Geophysical Corp., a case that requires the justices yet again to consider  Section 271 of the Patent Act. [read post]