Search for: "STATE v BARTLETT" Results 301 - 320 of 495
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
1 Mar 2013, 2:30 pm by Bexis
  And drug companies are deep pockets, so these cases provide one instance after another (Bartlett was another SJS/TENS case) of courts leaning over backwards to justify liability. [read post]
29 Jan 2016, 6:07 am
Halliburton, Extraterritoriality,Fraud-on-the-Market, Jurisdiction, Omnicare v. [read post]
17 Feb 2016, 4:30 am
  But Scalia’s rejoinder (not so different from his repeated, inelegant advice to Bush v. [read post]
18 Feb 2015, 7:51 am
  The Bartlett v Mutual product liability case gave rise to some awful rulings in the New Hampshire federal court before the Supreme Court set things right in what might be our favorite case of the last five years. [read post]
5 Jul 2013, 5:00 am by Bexis
Nev. 2011) (FDA compliance “relevant and admissible” but not “a bar to recovery”); Bartlett v. [read post]
29 Apr 2011, 7:43 am by PRATER, DUNCAN & CRAIG 770-253-7778
Katz, Sheppard Mullin Richter & Hampton LLP, Los Angeles 6 $257,679,500 Consumer Protection State of Louisiana v. [read post]
24 Jun 2013, 5:25 pm by Cicely Wilson
State-law design-defect claims based on the adequacy of a drug’s warnings are preempted by federal law under a 2011 Supreme Court decision, PLIVA, Inc. v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 9:21 am by Clerquette LeClerq
State wrote to tell us about a Judicial Sight-ation. [read post]