Search for: "STATE v DIAZ"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,154
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Jul 2011, 8:58 am
Stat. (1993); see also Diaz v. [read post]
15 Feb 2007, 2:36 pm
I just relooked at the cert petition in Craig v. [read post]
6 Dec 2021, 3:00 am
The United States Supreme Court held in Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
29 Jan 2008, 8:09 am
Carlos Diaz et.al. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 7:55 am
Last week United States District Judge Stephen V. [read post]
27 Nov 2017, 8:35 am
Today's DJ offers Choosing DIY When You Need to Appeal, the Appellate Zealots column this month by Charles Kagay, about Diaz v. [read post]
18 Jul 2015, 7:55 am
Last week United States District Judge Stephen V. [read post]
8 Nov 2007, 11:46 pm
Navarro-Diaz, 420 F.3d 581, 588 (6th Cir.2005) (same), and United States v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Weekly S486 (Fla., July 12, 2007) ....................................................................16 Diaz v. [read post]
19 Nov 2007, 5:45 am
Weekly S486 (Fla., July 12, 2007) ....................................................................16 Diaz v. [read post]
13 Sep 2009, 2:11 am
ACCA has issued a memorandum opinion in United States v. [read post]
23 Jun 2011, 1:33 pm
For example, one study trying to determine the impact of Mapp v. [read post]
25 Jun 2009, 5:41 am
United States v. [read post]
11 May 2009, 3:47 am
The US Supreme Court has finished oral argument for the term, and about the only key criminal case still undecided is Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
20 Jun 2024, 7:38 am
12 Nov 2008, 10:15 am
It took me awhile to track down the transcript of oral arguments from Melendez-Diaz v. [read post]
15 Mar 2010, 2:18 pm
In United States v. [read post]
7 Sep 2009, 8:09 am
SUPREME COURT held in MELENDEZ-DIAZ v. [read post]
15 Jul 2016, 6:22 am
Diaz (2015) 238 Cal.App.4th 1323, 1336–1338 (Diaz ) considered the precise argument advanced by Anderson and found that, in light of the Act's stated purposes, no retroactive application of its provisions is appropriate, and further that [read post]
26 Jun 2009, 2:21 am
Thinking about yesterday's decision in Melendez-Diaz led me to think about last week's decision in District Attorney's Office for Third Judicial Dist. v. [read post]
