Search for: "STATE v. PATRON" Results 301 - 320 of 1,249
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 Jan 2019, 6:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: cert-petition-2.pdf Question presented: Whether the Tenth Circuit panel violated the current jurisprudence of this Court and the Congressional policy underlying IGRA by precluding the Nation from exercising its sovereign authority to permit a patron’s tort claim against the Nation and its gaming facility to be brought in state court without express congressional permission. [read post]
16 Jan 2019, 6:26 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Here: cert-petition-2.pdf Question presented: Whether the Tenth Circuit panel violated the current jurisprudence of this Court and the Congressional policy underlying IGRA by precluding the Nation from exercising its sovereign authority to permit a patron’s tort claim against the Nation and its gaming facility to be brought in state court without express congressional permission. [read post]
17 Dec 2018, 8:02 am by Andrew Hamm
Sanford was a patron of the arts, literature and sciences as well as a well-known writer and public speaker. [read post]
10 Dec 2018, 2:00 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
Rivas explained that he is not challenging or seeking re-review of FEN's conviction in state court. [read post]
15 Nov 2018, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar
In McCulloch, for example, if Maryland had not imposed a targeted tax on the Bank of the United States, but instead had targeted employees or patrons of the Bank with a special tax, does anyone think the result would be any different? [read post]
22 Oct 2018, 4:18 pm by INFORRM
The statute lays down that a duty of care is owed to visitors in respect of dangers due to the state of the premises or to things done or omitted to be done on them. [read post]
5 Oct 2018, 8:49 am by The Murray Law Firm
Our Legal Take Nightclub patrons have a right to feel safe and secure while on the premises. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:12 am by Michael Grossman
If you think about it, the states that don’t allow alcohol provider’s to be sued when they grossly over-serve their patrons sort of contradict their own reasoning. [read post]