Search for: "STATE v. WATSON" Results 301 - 320 of 1,064
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
14 Jun 2017, 9:04 am by John Elwood
” United States v. [read post]
14 Jun 2017, 6:50 am by Aurora Barnes
Alabama 16-7835 Issue: Whether a state court can enforce a rule that Brady v. [read post]
13 Jun 2017, 5:16 am by Amira Mikhail, Jordan Brunner
United States, the court analogizes this case to Legal Assistance for Vietnamese Asylum Seekers v. [read post]
2 Jun 2017, 8:25 am by Quinta Jurecic
’” All these opinions rely heavily on McCreary County v. [read post]
23 May 2017, 2:34 pm by Orin Kerr
Watson, 423 U.S. 411, 416 (1976), and the absence of a “clear, controlling case explicitly stating that the government may not obtain real-time cell site location data under the SCA,” United States v. [read post]
21 May 2017, 4:41 pm by INFORRM
United States Blog Law Online has a post dealing with the question “Is journalism harassment? [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:15 am by Jane Chong
Below, Judge Watson determined the state has standing based on monetary and intangible injuries to its university system ("nearly indistinguishable," according to the court, from the injuries found sufficient to confer standing in the Ninth Circuit's Washington v. [read post]
15 May 2017, 9:00 am by Jane Chong
    Live Blog Hawaii v. [read post]
9 May 2017, 4:59 am by Jane Chong
Yesterday afternoon, the Fourth Circuit, sitting en banc, heard two hours of argument in IRAP v. [read post]
27 Apr 2017, 1:30 am by Thaddeus Mason Pope, JD, PhD
John's University School of LawKatherine Schostok, DePaul University College of LawAllison Winnike, University of Houston Law Center 5:00 – 7:00 PM Welcome Reception – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law Friday, June 9, 20177:30 – 8:15 AM Registration & Breakfast – Henson Atrium, Georgia State Law 8:15 – 8:30 AM Opening Remarks – Ceremonial Courtroom, Georgia State LawWendy Hensel, Interim Dean and Professor of Law, Georgia… [read post]
24 Apr 2017, 8:33 am by Quinta Jurecic
And with respect to the President, in particular, it is what undergirds the Supreme Court’s decision in Clinton v. [read post]