Search for: "SUMMERS v. POWERS"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,008
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
29 Nov 2010, 6:24 am
Plata, which raises questions regarding the power of federal judges to take steps to reduce prison overcrowding. [read post]
7 Oct 2013, 6:35 am
While the Court issued a massive list of orders on cases that had come in over the summer recess, it took no action on nine pending petitions testing the federal government’s power to regulate so-called “greenhouse gases” in an effort to head off global warming. [read post]
8 Sep 2009, 9:07 am
The article makes reference to a US Supreme Court case from 84 years ago, and not being intimately familiar with it, I drug up Cooke v. [read post]
6 Sep 2010, 10:21 am
In Buckman Co. v. [read post]
19 Mar 2012, 9:06 pm
But the Court returned to a strict interpretation of the ban in 1962, in the case of Enochs v. [read post]
6 Sep 2012, 9:06 pm
Holder and Shelby County v. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 8:18 am
With the long conference still a week away, several Justices have filled their last days of summer with public appearances. [read post]
2 Apr 2019, 6:30 am
Xcentric, Garcia v. [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 4:56 pm
Supreme Court to hear Fisher v. [read post]
24 Feb 2009, 4:23 pm
Marbury v. [read post]
26 Aug 2019, 3:43 am
’” That 1952 case, Ray v. [read post]
17 Jun 2020, 5:38 am
Just when we thought our summers might have been looking a bit dull, it was announced that the Court of Justice of the European Union (CJEU) will be making its final ruling in Case C-311/18, Data Protection Commissioner v Facebook Ireland & Schrems on 16 July 2020. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:01 pm
An 8-1 decision, Glacier Northwest v. [read post]
27 Jun 2023, 1:01 pm
An 8-1 decision, Glacier Northwest v. [read post]
11 Jan 2011, 4:00 pm
A transfer could put the detainee beyond the court’s power of review. [read post]
9 Oct 2011, 11:29 pm
Supreme Court denied cert last week in Diaz v. [read post]
27 Jun 2012, 1:57 pm
The law of neutrality in one of the most longstanding principles of the LOAC, established in 1907 at the Hague Convention (V) Respecting the Rights and Duties of Neutral Powers and Persons in Case of War on Land. [read post]
20 Apr 2018, 1:06 pm
Judge Manion is correct that the Supreme Court did not address the merits of the national injunction, even though it clearly recognizes that this is a major question--one that it granted certiorari on in Summers v. [read post]
14 May 2014, 8:24 am
The court had to decide whether the requirements for PIE were met.The Kiewitzes contended that there was a dispute of facts which could not be decided on papers, since this was an application and not summons for eviction.The applicants, Charles Bernard and Katrina Summers, according to the court, failed to meet all the requirements of the PIE Act. [read post]
22 Jun 2010, 5:57 am
Yesterday in Monsanto Co. v. [read post]
