Search for: "SUPERIOR COURT OF PENNSYLVANIA" Results 301 - 320 of 2,967
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 May 2022, 4:00 am by Jim Sedor
California – Judge Halts Angel Stadium Sale for FBI Corruption Probe of Anaheim Mayor KABC – City News Service | Published: 5/17/2022 The city of Anaheim’s planned sale of Angel Stadium to team owner Arte Moreno’s company was halted for at least two months by an Orange County Superior Court judge, who agreed to a request by the state to pause the deal amid a federal corruption probe of Mayor Harry Sidhu. [read post]
17 May 2022, 10:00 am by Attorney Ketchel
The ruling made by the Pennsylvania Superior Court was in rejection to an appeal of a DUI case, in which the defendant was charged with DUI after initially being pulled over for illegally speeding. [read post]
17 May 2022, 10:00 am by Attorney Ketchel
The ruling made by the Pennsylvania Superior Court was in rejection to an appeal of a DUI case, in which the defendant was charged with DUI after initially being pulled over for illegally speeding. [read post]
13 May 2022, 8:13 am by Edward T. Kang and Ryan T. Kirk
Both the trial and Superior Court refused to grant this relief, principally because the Supreme Court had never endorsed such a theory. [read post]
12 May 2022, 5:00 am
The court granted the Motion to Dismiss this claim and, citing the Pennsylvania Superior Court case of Strutz v. [read post]
10 May 2022, 9:02 pm by Marci A. Hamilton
I could say, “I told you so,” but instead I’m going to lay out the reality leading to the Supreme Court draft overruling of Roe v. [read post]
5 May 2022, 3:14 pm by Eugene Volokh
Bryan Advisory Services, LLC, decided today by the Pennsylvania Superior Court (Judges John Bender, Alice Beck Dubow, and James Gardner Colins), involved a dispute between financial advisors (who had a financial company called VAM) and a parent financial company (BAS) with which they had been affiliated: [The plaintiffs] learned that Mr. [read post]
4 May 2022, 8:46 am by Mark Ashton
On these facts relocation was granted and affirmed by a panel of the Superior Court. [read post]
2 May 2022, 7:28 am by Mark Ashton
While quoting extensively from the petition, the Superior Court does a fair amount of grammatical editing. [read post]
26 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court found that the trial court properly granted summary judgment to a fitness facility in a Plaintiffs’ slip and fall action where the membership agreement signed by the Plaintiff was not found to be a contract of adhesion.The court also found that the release in the agreement clearly foreclosed the Plaintiff from proceeding on the claim presented. [read post]
22 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court held that the trial court did not err when it found that the Defendant did not have the requisite minimum contacts with Pennsylvania for the trial court to exercise jurisdiction.According to the Opinion, this case arose out of a construction contract dispute. [read post]
20 Apr 2022, 1:03 pm by Edward T. Kang and Ryan T. Kirk
Three years later, in another case dealing with the Sandusky scandal, the Pennsylvania Superior Court would come to an identical interpretation of Pa.R.C.P. 4003.3. [read post]
13 Apr 2022, 5:36 pm
  Objectively speaking, natural law, as a term of politics and jurisprudence, may be defined as a loosely knit body of rules of action prescribed by an authority superior to the state. [read post]
12 Apr 2022, 4:00 am
.), the Pennsylvania Superior Court quashed an appeal by a worker’s compensation carrier who had appealed the trial court’s denial of its Motion to Intervene in a personal injury case. [read post]
11 Apr 2022, 6:31 am
After reviewing the case before it and the applicable law, the Pennsylvania Superior Court affirmed the trial court’s decision that the Pennsylvania Supreme Court had not suspended the right of Plaintiff to collect delay damages during the 2020 judicial emergency. [read post]
8 Apr 2022, 5:00 am
In so ruling, the Pennsylvania Superior Court also held that the Plaintiffs had an obligation to conduct discovery for any additional evidence that would have supported their claim to venue. [read post]