Search for: "Said v. Clinton"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,163
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Jun 2023, 4:52 pm
Before us in the present is a 49-page document docketed as 23-cr-80101 in the Southern District of Florida, conspicuously captioned: United States of America v. [read post]
3 May 2018, 3:32 am
Then in 1997, the Supreme Court said in Clinton v. [read post]
27 Nov 2013, 10:28 am
In fact, Governor Clinton, who was Governor of New York from 1777 to 1795 is said to have “long cherished the hope of Oneida Removal. [read post]
20 Aug 2022, 12:54 pm
"Wrong," he said. [read post]
3 Apr 2023, 4:11 am
“People v Donald ….mmm, hang on, how is that pronounced? [read post]
17 Mar 2012, 6:12 am
But, as I said, I know libertarians. [read post]
4 Feb 2016, 5:19 pm
’ Staples v. [read post]
17 Jul 2008, 2:21 pm
But Judge Lehner, in another case (Larabee v. [read post]
2 May 2018, 2:15 pm
” The more serious problem with this argument is that it is suspiciously like the one the court rejected unanimously in Clinton v. [read post]
7 May 2009, 1:02 pm
The DADT policy was adopted in 1993, an outcome of the uproar when Bill Clinton signalled that he really meant what he said when he campaigned for president on a pledge to end the ban on military service by gay people. [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 8:16 am
Murphy is a 1994 Clinton appointee, and Smith is a 2002 appointee nominated by George W. [read post]
18 Aug 2013, 10:47 am
Harding's pardon of Eugene V. [read post]
19 Jun 2017, 11:40 am
But something interestingly new could happen in this case, which is called Gill v. [read post]
14 Jan 2016, 8:43 pm
They said what was good for the goose was no good for the gander. [read post]
25 Oct 2018, 11:47 am
Ingrid Wuerth argued that, in the upcoming Jam v. [read post]
12 Dec 2016, 6:12 am
(Wickard v. [read post]
13 Jan 2018, 3:15 pm
As the Supreme Court has said, in drafting that provision of the Constitution [Cramer v. [read post]
11 Feb 2016, 1:52 pm
In February 1996, President Bill Clinton signed it. [read post]
13 Feb 2011, 2:43 am
Yet that is precisely what the court did by a 9-to-0 vote in the 1997 case of Clinton v. [read post]
22 Sep 2016, 5:28 am
Three days later, Halbig v. [read post]
