Search for: "Sales v. United States"
Results 301 - 320
of 8,896
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
31 Jul 2023, 4:47 pm
On the other hand, the Colorado restriction might not survive the application of United States v United Foods, Inc 533 US 405 (2001), where obligations upon fresh mushroom handlers pay assessments used primarily to fund advertisements promoting mushroom sales did not survive Central Hudson scrutiny as mediated through Glickman v Wileman Brothers & Elliott, Inc 521 US 457 (1997). [read post]
28 Jul 2023, 5:55 am
Thomas Lubanga Dyilo and Prosecutor v. [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 11:42 pm
See, e.g., “United States v. 1855.6 Pounds of American Paddlefish Meat” (Nov. 14, 2018), and the sequel, “Update: The Paddlefish Defendants Are Now for Sale (Jan. 28, 2019). [read post]
27 Jul 2023, 4:45 pm
Like the Blake legislation, SB 5440 is derived from a court case, Trueblood v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 6:56 pm
(That "standard" was set by the Supreme Court in Caeteno v. [read post]
25 Jul 2023, 9:29 am
” Violating State Licensing LawsFailing to disclose compensation arrangements with trades can also be the basis for a claim against an interior designer’s license as states that regulate the practice of interior design, such as California, New York, Florida (and approximately 36 other states within the United States and Canada), impose rules that require disclosure. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:59 pm
The United States proposed a broad product market including all shoes. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 11:58 am
United States, the D.C. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 6:55 am
Sandoz Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jul 2023, 3:54 am
Audemars Piquet Holding S.A. v. [read post]
23 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
FTC Chair Lina Khan previewed this in June, stating that “The word ‘efficiency’ doesn’t appear anywhere in the antitrust statutes. [read post]
22 Jul 2023, 4:22 pm
In US v. [read post]
19 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm
Federal and state rules already require reporting of most Scope 1 emissions, including the pollution from power plants that are others’ Scope 2 emissions. [read post]
17 Jul 2023, 8:32 am
Hetronic International Inc., the Supreme Court held that the Lanham Act does not reach trademark infringement that occurs outside of the United States (US). [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 9:01 pm
In Groff v. [read post]
16 Jul 2023, 4:51 pm
” Similarly, the United States District Court for the Middle District of Florida, in Lucky Cousins Trucking, Inc. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 2:43 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 2:43 pm
Co. v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 1:22 pm
Here the District Court–– citing the well-known AT&T acquisition of TimeWarner in 2018 (See United States v. [read post]
14 Jul 2023, 12:30 pm
" Student accepts internship at ExxonMobil, believing (erroneously) that he had the permanent authorization to work in the United States that ExxonMobil required for the job. [read post]
