Search for: "Samsung"
Results 301 - 320
of 6,473
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
28 Jul 2022, 10:28 am
Samsung, and notes the following:"Here, Apple invites this Court to inject itself into an ongoing proceeding in Colombia. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 9:52 pm
In Samsung Electronics Co Ltd v LG Display Co Ltd [2022] EWCA Civ 466 the Court of Appeal observed that a “clear and compelling justification must be provided” to depart upwards from London 1 Guideline Hourly Rates (GHRs) as “the guideline rates for London 1 already assume that the litigation in question qualifies as ‘very heavy […] [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 1:43 pm
In 2017, Samsung filed an amicus curiae brief in support of the U.S. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 12:45 pm
Google’s failed partnership with Samsung, back in 2012, still looms large over the industry. [read post]
27 Jul 2022, 11:00 am
According to a complaint filed in San Francisco federal court, Apple “coerces” consumers who use its smartphones, smart watches and tablets into using its own wallet for contactless payments, unlike makers of Android-based devices that let consumers choose wallets such as Google Pay and Samsung Pay. [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 8:55 am
According to a complaint filed in San Francisco federal court, Apple “coerces” consumers who use its smartphones, smart watches and tablets into using its own wallet for contactless payments, unlike makers of Android-based devices that let consumers choose wallets such as Google Pay and Samsung Pay. . . . [read post]
22 Jul 2022, 4:34 am
ACM, New York, NY, USA, 18 pages. https://doi.org/10.1145/3503161.3547838 Additional Reading [Samsung Labs] MegaPortraits: One-shot Megapixel Neural Head Avatars Defining Cyber Discovery? [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 10:00 pm
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently granted the institution of an inter partes review in Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 10:00 pm
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently granted the institution of an inter partes review in Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 10:00 pm
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently granted the institution of an inter partes review in Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 10:00 pm
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently granted the institution of an inter partes review in Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 10:00 pm
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently granted the institution of an inter partes review in Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
17 Jul 2022, 10:00 pm
The Patent Trial and Appeal Board recently granted the institution of an inter partes review in Samsung Electronics Co. v. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 11:16 pm
But it is then clear legal error on Judge Brinkman's part to set the bar for a patent PI so high that it is, on the bottom line, exclusively available to direct competitors.His decision also fails to consider that Ericsson's licensees, such as Samsung, do compete with Apple.The ECJ made it abundantly clear that patent PIs must be widely available:"39. [read post]
16 Jul 2022, 6:24 am
Pair Bose Frames To Your Samsung Smartwatch. [read post]
15 Jul 2022, 10:52 pm
Ericsson's opposition brief argues it's actually worse and Apple now wants the Texas court to enter the kind of antisuit injunction that a Chinese court had granted Samsung against Ericsson, in response to which Ericsson requested and obtained an anti-interference or anti-antisuit injunction. [read post]
14 Jul 2022, 9:37 am
As I found out last month, K.Mizra is asserting another patent--which was also originally obtained by the Dutch research institute I mentioned further above--against Samsung, and if Samsung's phones infringe, then it's actually Google's Android mobile operating system that implements the patented technique.Niantic was granted leave to file a post-trial brief, but the fact that the ruling is scheduled for five weeks from now--and three weeks after the deadline for… [read post]
10 Jul 2022, 8:36 am
In 2012, Apple failed with a motion for a preliminary injunction against two Samsung products in Munich, where the court doubted the validity of the patent-in-suit. [read post]
8 Jul 2022, 10:55 pm
Ericsson went to the Texas court because Samsung had obtained an antisuit injunction from a Chinese court that interfered with the Texas proceedings, including the potential enforcement of U.S. patents. [read post]
7 Jul 2022, 7:14 am
Posted on Defective Products Blog / Blog / CDC Fudged Numbers Centers for Disease Control and Prevention: COVID Numbers Are Off by Tens of Thousands? [read post]
