Search for: "Samuel Anthony Alito"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,363
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
6 Apr 2018, 6:49 am
But her replacement, Justice Samuel Alito, is ideologically distant from her, and she has reportedly expressed disappointment in his performance. [read post]
3 Apr 2018, 7:31 am
The argument suggested that the justices would be deeply divided, and it offered no reason to think that the three justices who voted against the service advisors the last time this case was before the court (Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas and Samuel Alito) would view the matter any differently this time. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 11:28 am
Although there seemed to be a fairly broad agreement in the Wisconsin case that partisan gerrymandering is, as Justice Samuel Alito indicated, “distasteful,” there was no apparent consensus beyond that. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:53 am
Justices Ginsburg, Samuel Alito and Kagan each authored two of these majority opinions, with Alito authoring the decisions in Jennings and Ayestas, Ginsburg in Digital Realty and Artis, and Kagan in Cyan and U.S. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 6:05 pm
Pressing Fisher, Justice Samuel Alito wondered about cases in which a judge “specifically disavows any reliance on the guidelines”; pressing Feigin, Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Sonia Sotomayor stressed that sometimes “district judges do take into account the guidelines … when they determine how much time to include for substantial assistance. [read post]
27 Mar 2018, 7:33 am
” Justice Samuel Alito asked whether a challenge to shackling occurring at the jail, as distinct from in the courtroom, would be immediately reviewable; Cahn conceded that it would not. [read post]
23 Mar 2018, 7:53 am
At October’s oral argument in the Wisconsin case, there seemed to be a fairly broad consensus that partisan gerrymandering is, as Justice Samuel Alito indicated, “distasteful. [read post]
21 Mar 2018, 4:31 pm
Justice Samuel Alito led the way with his “ripped-from-the-headlines” example: Let’s say a state or the federal government wants to construct a highway or maybe it’s a pipeline, and there’s opposition to this project, so the people who are opposed to the project enlist an Indian tribe to buy a little parcel of land along the route of this highway or this pipeline. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 6:12 pm
With four justices (Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Clarence Thomas, Samuel Alito and Neil Gorsuch) indicating that they would have denied Bucklew’s request, those votes presumably came from Justices Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor and Elena Kagan. [read post]
20 Mar 2018, 1:03 pm
Justice Anthony Kennedy also expressed doubts about the law. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 12:15 pm
As I show in the book, Scalia and Justice Samuel Alito often voted together even though Alito did not agree with either originalism or textualism. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 11:02 am
By Geoffrey R. [read post]
19 Mar 2018, 10:15 am
The opinions in those cases (by Justices Anthony Kennedy, Ruth Bader Ginsburg and Samuel Alito, respectively) run the ideological gamut, reflecting an apparently growing consensus among the sitting justices that it is Congress’ role to decide when a lawsuit is stale and not the role of the justices to tinker around the edges. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 12:08 pm
Like Roberts, Justice Anthony Kennedy was hard to read. [read post]
28 Feb 2018, 10:15 am
The plurality opinion comes from Justice Clarence Thomas (joined by Justices Stephen Breyer, Samuel Alito and Elena Kagan). [read post]
27 Feb 2018, 12:51 pm
Justice Samuel Alito seemed to share Roberts’ view. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 2:36 pm
That is, Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Anthony Kennedy, Clarence Thomas, and Samuel Alito leaning toward overruling Abood, and Justices Ruth Bader Ginsburg, Stephen Breyer, Sonia Sotomayor, and Elena Kagan speaking up in defense of agency fees. [read post]
26 Feb 2018, 12:23 pm
However, five justices – Justice Samuel Alito, joined by Chief Justice John Roberts and Justices Antonin Scalia, Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas – suggested that they might be willing to reconsider Abood. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 12:10 pm
” Justice Samuel Alito’s dissent, joined by Justices Anthony Kennedy and Clarence Thomas, variously describes Breyer’s opinion as “incoheren[t]” and “a muddle,” and indeed the opinion provides no definitive answer regarding what appellate claims, precisely, a guilty plea that lacks explicit waivers of appeal will allow. [read post]
22 Feb 2018, 8:04 am
” Before she could get any farther, Justice Samuel Alito, a dissenter in Molina-Martinez, protested, “Here, we’re not even talking about something that’s mandatory,” an allusion to the Supreme Court’s decision in United States v. [read post]
