Search for: "Sanders v. US" Results 301 - 320 of 891
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
15 Apr 2023, 6:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
The contract's merger clause precludes petitioner's reliance on communications between the parties and other extrinsic sources to support its proposed definition (see Schron v Troutman Sanders LLP, 20 NY3d 430, 436 [2013]). [read post]
5 Nov 2014, 7:20 am
 Ben Challis (1709 Blog) was quick off the mark with news that Klinger v Conan Doyle Estate (the "Sherlock Holmes" case) is not heading for a US Supreme Court ruling, Tara Aaron (Aaron Sanders) has potted this too, for IP Breakdown. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 11:09 am by Vishnu Kannan
John Sanders, acting head of U.S. [read post]
11 Apr 2018, 9:32 am by Eugene Volokh
Nevertheless, the court below concluded that Williams-Yulee rendered unpersuasive these arguments—the very arguments used to invalidate similar restrictions in the "pre-Williams-Yulee world," e.g., Sanders County Republican Central Committee v. [read post]
6 Feb 2016, 8:42 pm by Ilya Somin
Private takings of the type that Trump seeks defend were upheld by the Supreme Court in its controversial 2005 decision in Kelo v. [read post]
23 Mar 2015, 1:42 am
US Congressman Cummings and Senator Sanders have just sent letters to 14 generic drug manufacturers, requesting information about escalating prices of generic drugs. [read post]
17 Dec 2015, 9:01 pm by Vikram David Amar and Michael Schaps
By now most Verdict readers have probably heard about Justice Scalia’s provocative comments at last week’s oral argument in Fisher v. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
(UAW) v Yard-Man, Inc. (716 F2d 1476 [6th Cir 1983], cert denied 465 US 1007 [1984]) and its progeny. [read post]
6 Mar 2022, 5:46 am by Public Employment Law Press
(UAW) v Yard-Man, Inc. (716 F2d 1476 [6th Cir 1983], cert denied 465 US 1007 [1984]) and its progeny. [read post]
2 Apr 2010, 2:18 am by gmlevine
Domains By Proxy, Inc. / Rich Sanders and Octogen e-Solutions, D2009-0786 (WIPO August 19, 2009). [read post]
3 Jan 2007, 1:17 pm
Article 115a of the Basic Law (Grundgesetz) refers to the Verteidigungsfall - literally, the situation where defence is necessary (Muret-Sanders im V.: if defence becomes necessary). [read post]