Search for: "Savage v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 514
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 Apr 2012, 6:19 am by Marissa Miller
United States, in which the Court will consider the constitutionality of several provisions of S.B. 1070, Arizona’s immigration law. [read post]
30 Mar 2012, 10:49 am by Matthew Hill
At that time the domestic case law – and in particular the High Court decision in Savage v South Essex Partnership NHS Foundation Trust [2006] EWHC 356 and the Court of Appeal in R (Takoushis) v Inner North London Coroner and Another [2005] EWCA Civ 1440  – stated that the death by his own hand or actions of a person who was not formally detained by the state could not (other than in particular circumstances not applicable in Mr Reynolds… [read post]
28 Mar 2012, 6:52 am by Conor McEvily
Bullock, a case that might allow the Court to reconsider its decision two years ago in Citizens United v. [read post]
9 Mar 2012, 6:04 am by Joshua Matz
United States, arguing that the Ninth Circuit’s “unbounded interpretation risks greater over criminalization and further misuse of the federal criminal code. [read post]
29 Feb 2012, 6:51 am by Conor McEvily
Politifact.com evaluates a claim by presidential candidate Rick Santorum that Justice Ginsburg “prefers” the South African constitution to the United States Constitution; it concludes that “Santorum’s take on Ginsburg’s comments twisted a handful of words to mean something they did not. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am by Joe Consumer
And until Kiobel, corporations headquartered or doing business in the United States have always been liable, as well. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 9:03 am by Joe Consumer
And until Kiobel, corporations headquartered or doing business in the United States have always been liable, as well. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 7:59 am by Raffaela Wakeman
More bad news from Afghanistan: Matthew Rosenberg and Thom Shanker document U.S. concerns that Afghanistan is not yet ready for the United States to withdraw its troops. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 6:47 am by Marissa Miller
University of Texas at Austin and the arguments in United States v. [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 7:31 am by Robert Chesney
   This sparked much criticism, including from those who strongly preferred to see Daqduq prosecuted in some American forum (though this camp was itself divided, as some argued against this option if it meant bringing him to the United States). [read post]
24 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Joshua Matz
Discussing oral argument in United States v. [read post]
23 Feb 2012, 7:34 am by Kiran Bhat
The Court heard arguments in two cases yesterday morning, with United States v. [read post]
22 Feb 2012, 6:45 am by Conor McEvily
Today the Court will hear oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
21 Feb 2012, 6:54 am by Nabiha Syed
Elsewhere, coverage looks ahead to Wednesday’s scheduled oral argument in United States v. [read post]