Search for: "Say v. Baker"
Results 301 - 320
of 1,402
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
7 Jun 2019, 6:30 am
See, e.g., Frankfurter's opinions first in Gobitis and then his angry and anguished dissent in Barnette that helped to establish the split within liberalism between those who believed in "judicial restraint" and those who were beginning to rally around what came to be called "Footnote 4" liberalism instantiated in such decisions as Brown and then, perhaps most strikingly, Baker v. [read post]
6 Jun 2019, 7:30 am
In fact, Nevada specifically prohibits discrimination in “baker[ies]. [read post]
31 May 2019, 9:57 am
See Klein v. [read post]
22 May 2019, 8:14 am
And Stewart Baker shared two episodes of The Cyberlaw Podcast. [read post]
20 May 2019, 2:21 pm
" Suffice it to say that the latest case can't be understood without consulting both Orin Kerr and Jerry Seinfeld. [read post]
15 May 2019, 10:06 pm
Insufficiently distinctive, says EUIPO Fourth Board of Appeal. [read post]
14 May 2019, 7:29 am
The following is a series of questions prompted by the forthcoming publication of Michael Bobelian’s “Battle for the Marble Palace: Abe Fortas, Earl Warren, Lyndon Johnson, Richard Nixon, and the Forging of the Modern Supreme Court” (Schaffner Press, 2019). [read post]
7 May 2019, 3:00 am
Quick Poll: How Does the SEC v. [read post]
26 Apr 2019, 9:53 am
See Barnett v. [read post]
22 Apr 2019, 6:30 am
Justice Frankfurter no doubt contributed to this change in Baker v. [read post]
7 Apr 2019, 4:03 pm
The ICO issued a statement saying the she expected Facebook to review its current appeal against the ICO’s £500,000 fine arising out of the Cambridge Analytica affair. [read post]
3 Apr 2019, 8:54 am
Baker Jr. is Professor Emeritus of Law at the Louisiana State University Law Center. [read post]
31 Mar 2019, 11:50 pm
There was an editorial in the Times saying that this was the “Right Direction”. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 12:56 pm
By 1961, his position had not changed, and he attempted to sway Justice Potter Stewart to his side while Baker v. [read post]
28 Mar 2019, 8:56 am
Monagan (1988, pp. 170), Sheldon Novick (1989, pp. 522), Liva Baker (1991, pp. 783), G. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 3:33 pm
Conservatives v. [read post]
25 Mar 2019, 7:07 am
Menell and David Nimmer in a separate submission also highlight inconsistency with SCOTUS’s seminal decision in Baker v. [read post]
11 Mar 2019, 1:03 pm
State v. [read post]
5 Mar 2019, 7:41 am
EEOC v. [read post]
3 Mar 2019, 4:51 pm
Lachaux v Independent Print, heard 13 and 14 November 2018 (UKSC) ZXC v Bloomberg, heard 27-28 and 30 November 2018 (Nicklin J) R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal, heard 3 and 4 December 2018 (UKSC) Ali v Channel 5, heard 4 December 2018 (Irwin, Newey and Baker LJJ). [read post]
