Search for: "Sayed v. Page"
Results 301 - 320
of 12,104
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
15 Oct 2008, 10:45 pm
In Travelers Casualty and Surety Co. v. [read post]
10 Jul 2008, 4:05 am
Lawson, says (in its entirety): "On page 19, second sentence of the first full paragraph, the word "Labow" is inserted after the word "Respondent" so the sentence reads: Respondent Labow shall recover costs of appeal. [read post]
29 Dec 2009, 1:48 pm
Here are the first two paragraphs, which pretty much say it all. [read post]
2 Nov 2010, 3:33 pm
As my father -- whose family was from Iowa -- used to say: "They grow 'em big in Iowa. [read post]
3 Mar 2011, 6:56 am
His three-page concurring opinion (scroll to page 20 of the court’s ruling) noted the majority did not say anything about Internet postings. [read post]
27 Feb 2007, 11:08 pm
To say the least. [read post]
16 Jul 2008, 12:37 pm
March 12, 2008), of which the court quotes seven pages [so why not just say "this case is the same, affirmed; unpublished"?]. [read post]
7 Oct 2014, 3:27 pm
Very well-written, as always.Judge Reinhardt also authors a concurring opinion that says that the same-sex marriage bans should also be invalidated on substantive due process grounds as well. [read post]
17 Jun 2024, 2:40 pm
The majority says "No. [read post]
5 Sep 2023, 1:21 pm
As a result, a law firm that would otherwise have gotten money from the estate and blocked account -- someone who was entitled to this money pursuant to a court order -- sued Chase Bank.It takes the Court of Appeal 34 pages to say that, yes, in such settings, the law firm can sue. [read post]
5 Jun 2019, 1:43 pm
The Court of Appeal says that it "elected to proceed with the opinion given because the appeal was fully briefed and raised important issues. [read post]
4 May 2020, 12:11 pm
Her amicus brief in Matal v. [read post]
18 Aug 2022, 9:49 am
Steiner * Vague Takedown Notice Targeting Facebook Page Results in Possible Liability–CrossFit v. [read post]
26 Mar 2020, 7:48 am
The TAC is 730 paragraphs and 150 pages long. [read post]
18 Jan 2017, 7:58 am
"Usually if you amend an opinion to distinguish a case or two, you say more than just that you find them inapt, without explaining why they're so-not-apt.But apparently Justice Ikola thinks that simply calling them inapt is sufficient here. [read post]
16 Mar 2021, 2:46 pm
A version of "Name That Tune" with respect to opinions from the California Court of Appeal would be to attempt to accurately and summarize the thing in as few sentences as possible.For this opinion from today, I can Name That Tune in a single sentence:The evidence isn't insufficient as a matter of law to keep someone detained as an SVP when he's a repeat child molester who forthrightly admits that he can't guarantee that he won't molest another child upon his release,… [read post]
24 Aug 2023, 12:37 pm
Three years ago, when the Court of Appeal struck down Section 1814 of the Insurance Code, which prohibits bail companies from paying inmates from referring potential customers, as an unconstitutional infringement of free speech, I was skeptical, saying (among other things):Letting bail agents make "arrangements" with inmates to refer clients to 'em clearly, in my view, distorts the marketplace, and punishing such conduct will lead to a marketplace more closely (albeit… [read post]
2 Mar 2018, 11:19 am
It's instead the actual name of someone convicted of being a felon in possession of a firearm and a violent felon in possession of body armor.Second of all, it's symptomatic of contemporary legal analysis that it takes the Ninth Circuit sixteen single-spaced pages to say why attempted first degree murder is a "crime of violence" under federal law.Of course it's a crime of violence. [read post]
22 May 2023, 11:49 am
The California Constitution says very clearly that criminal defendants have the right to be "personally present" in court. [read post]
2 Dec 2016, 2:26 pm
Offenses that he committed in spades.)But then, after finishing the full 25 pages, I went and reread the portion about the sentence. [read post]
