Search for: "Schneider v. Schneider"
Results 301 - 320
of 656
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
11 Jun 2012, 1:30 pm
Schneider National Bulk Carriers, Inc. [read post]
27 Apr 2009, 5:00 am
As reported extensively, in Chint v. [read post]
10 Jun 2019, 4:24 am
In Nill v Schneider 2019 NY Slip Op 04392 Decided on June 5, 2019 Appellate Division, Second Department, there was a departure, but the Court found no proximate damage. [read post]
22 Jan 2014, 9:01 pm
American Library Assn. and Free Speech Coalition v. [read post]
26 Feb 2024, 3:54 am
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Goldfarb v Hoffman, 139 AD3d 474, 475 [1st Dept 2016]; Cascardo v Dratel, 171 AD3d 561, 562 [1st Dept 2019]; see CPLR 3211 [a] [1], [7]). [read post]
22 Dec 2009, 3:26 am
Provided that defendant attorneys were not discharged for cause, in which case they would not be entitled to any fee (see Matter of Montgomery, 272 NY 323, 326 [1936]), their recovery would be limited to the fair and reasonable value of their services, computed on the basis of quantum meruit (see Matter of Cohen v Grainger, Tesoriero & Bell, 81 NY2d 655, 658 [1993]; Lai Ling Cheng v Modansky Leasing Co., 73 NY2d 454, 457-458 [1989]; Schneider, Kleinick, Weitz,… [read post]
9 Sep 2014, 5:48 am
Commissioner, 84 T.C. 203 (1985) and Schneider v. [read post]
25 Feb 2022, 1:30 am
Quoting from both Lord Arbinger v Ashton [(1873) LR Eq 358 at 374] and Schneider NO and Others v AA and Another [2010 (5) SA 203 (WCC) at 211], the court re-iterated the position that, whilst there is no doubt some natural leaning on the part of an expert towards their paymasters, this does not in any way absolve the expert of the duty of impartiality and integrity. [read post]
12 Jun 2021, 1:29 pm
Jordan Schneider shared an episode of ChinaTalk in which he interviews Dr. [read post]
8 Jan 2024, 2:45 am
Ullmann-Schneider v Lacher & Lovell-Taylor, P.C., 121 AD3d 415, 416 [1st Dept 2014]; Soni v Pryor, 102 AD3d 856, 858 [2d Dept 2013]). [read post]
13 Sep 2024, 9:05 pm
Since the Supreme Court’s decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
18 May 2012, 3:46 pm
The first, Alexsam v. [read post]
19 May 2023, 3:51 am
Although the complaint does not allege any cognizable pecuniary damage to decedent’s estate, plaintiff Hardie Stevens’s affidavit corrects that deficiency by identifying several categories of damages to the estate, including increased taxes and legal fees (see Estate of Schneider v Finmann, 15 NY3d 306, 309-310 [2010]; Rudolf, 8 NY3d at 443; Leon v Martinez, 84 NY2d 83, 88 [1994]). [read post]
26 May 2023, 4:51 am
” “Contrary to defendants’ contention, plaintiff, as the personal representative of decedent’s estate, may bring a claim for legal malpractice alleging that defendants were negligent in the estate planning for decedent (see Estate of Schneider v Finmann, 15 NY3d 306, 309-310 [2010]). [read post]
26 Nov 2012, 12:46 pm
v. [read post]
21 Jun 2013, 12:43 pm
SCHNEIDER, LAURA H. [read post]
20 Aug 2012, 2:49 am
" "Absent fraud, collusion, malicious acts, or other special circumstances, an attorney is not liable to third parties, for harm caused by professional negligence, unless there is a relationship sufficiently approaching privity between the attorney and the alleged client Schneider v Finman 15 NY3d 306 309 (2010)). [read post]
18 Oct 2008, 9:28 pm
Co. v Schwanter, 39 AD3d 511, 512). [read post]
18 May 2007, 1:23 am
Schneider U.S. [read post]
18 Feb 2010, 12:27 am
DISTRICT COURTSOUTHERN DISTRICT OF NEW YORKCivil Practice Infringement Claim Preempted by Copyright Act; Action Stemming From TV Show Denied Remand Schneider v. [read post]
