Search for: "Secretary Department of Corrections"
Results 301 - 320
of 2,509
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
1 Jul 2022, 5:58 am
For example, on Friday, June 24, the House Appropriations Committee adopted an amendment to the Department of Homeland Security (DHS) funding bill for Fiscal Year (FY) 2023 that, if ultimately enacted, would seek to extend the specious policy and its use as an asylum ban indefinitely. [read post]
30 Jun 2022, 5:01 am
State Department Spokesman Ned Price expressed skepticism that importing security forces and methods from the PRC would actually benefit any Pacific Island country. [read post]
26 Jun 2022, 4:06 pm
He was granted permission to appeal on the question as to whether Steyn J was correct to say that the serious harm requirement needed to be satisfied at the time of the Commission’s statement. [read post]
22 Jun 2022, 8:15 am
The secretary of state will also be able to approve such codes or guidance. [read post]
21 Jun 2022, 1:06 am
It seemed to me that one inevitable consequence of the recent batch of judgments from Mostyn J on these issues (wherein he says that the parties are not entitled to anonymity as of right or even as a default) was that there would potentially be a marked increase in the number of reporting restriction applications that would be made in FR cases – either during any period of uncertainty or going forwards if it became settled that Mostyn’s view was correct. [read post]
19 Jun 2022, 5:08 am
The term, the Secretary’s “representative or agents,” encompasses each of the Department’s 240,000 employees; “[t]hey all carry out policy directives as pronounced by him. [read post]
18 Jun 2022, 5:10 am
Correct? [read post]
17 Jun 2022, 8:25 pm
It will also let the Department of Veterans Affairs move more quickly and comprehensively in the future to determine if illnesses are related to military service, and it will offer critical support to survivors who were harmed by exposures, including from water contamination at Camp LeJeune. [read post]
16 Jun 2022, 10:04 am
” The government now believes the 9th Circuit’s decision is correct and is consistent with other courts, and therefore the petition should be denied. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 1:39 pm
” These allegations were refuted by “President Trump’s own campaign advisors, the Department of Justice, and his cybersecurity experts,” she said. [read post]
15 Jun 2022, 2:57 am
So, the Appellant’s deportation to Jamaica by the Secretary of State for the Home Department would be unlawful unless the Appellant “can reasonably be expected to stay” in the rural areas of Jamaica. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:30 am
” Even if one, arguendo, believes that is a correct understanding of the national Constitution, that demonstrates only that one is a brute positivist. [read post]
14 Jun 2022, 6:15 am
Was the President correct when he declared that genocide was being committed in Ukraine? [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 11:37 am
Krug, Secretary, War Relocation Authority, D. [read post]
13 Jun 2022, 2:56 am
On Wednesday 15th June, the Court will hand down three judgments, starting at 09:45 in Courtroom One: Secretary of State for the Home Department v SC (Jamaica) [2022] UKSC 15 This is an immigration matter in which the court will consider the reasonable expectation to stay in Jamaica and any significant obstacles, and the correct tests to be applied. [read post]
10 Jun 2022, 11:26 am
The attorney has filed a report with the police department, and he is also filing a report with the FBI. [read post]
6 Jun 2022, 3:00 am
In appealing the judgment of [2020] CSIH 14, the Court will hear submissions on the correct approach that should be taken by courts and tribunals regarding evidence that the burden and standard of proof in historical claims for the recovery of VAT. [read post]
31 May 2022, 12:39 pm
On May 16, the Department of Justice (DOJ) filed a complaint a [read post]
23 May 2022, 5:57 am
Indeed, many of the Justice Department’s most important and politically charged cases have been won with circumstantial evidence. [read post]
23 May 2022, 1:00 am
In particular, the Court will decide whether the Court of Appeal was correct to hold that there is a starting point that no order for costs should be made against an unsuccessful regulator (except for good reason). [read post]
