Search for: "Security-First National Bank v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 1,234
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
This first of such NTLs, NTL No. 98-18N, was replaced by NTL No. 2003-N06, which was itself replaced by NTL No. 2008-N07. [read post]
29 Sep 2020, 3:29 pm by Kevin LaCroix
National Australia Bank, in which the Court clarified that the U.S. securities laws applies only to securities transactions that take place in the United States, either on an exchange or otherwise. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 1:55 am by Kevin Kaufman
(The part of the industrial sector covered by EU ETS is entirely exempt from the national carbon tax.) [read post]
Voter authentication is among the most controversial aspects of voting in the United States and will likely continue to be no matter the voting system put in place. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm by Jane Turner
The executives within USIS allegedly perpetrated a fraud against the United Statesnational security, and they will be known for that, as Percival will be known for being a whistleblower. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 12:32 pm by Jane Turner
The executives within USIS allegedly perpetrated a fraud against the United Statesnational security, and they will be known for that, as Percival will be known for being a whistleblower. [read post]
14 Sep 2020, 9:49 am by Rachael Hanna
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit decided United States v. [read post]
26 Aug 2020, 10:01 am by Anna Salvatore
Lawmakers first issued a subpoena in July 2019, but the Supreme Court held in Trump v. [read post]
20 Aug 2020, 12:31 pm by Josh Blackman, Seth Barrett Tillman
” Section 201(a)(1) defines this category to include members of Congress, as well as “an officer or employee or person acting for or on behalf of the United States. [read post]
17 Aug 2020, 5:01 am by Sean Quirk
” Since the July 12, 2016, arbitral tribunal ruling in Philippines v. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 11:49 am by Elena Chachko
The United States currently has more than 35 national emergencies in force—all triggering the broad IEEPA sanctions authorities. [read post]
8 Aug 2020, 12:55 am by INFORRM
Comparative human rights law Baldassi & Others in 2020 reaches the same conclusion as the Supreme Court of the United States in National Association for the Advancement of Colored People v. [read post]
7 Aug 2020, 7:47 pm
  It comes almost a year after the release of the first Draft--which generated substantial support among those inclined to embrace its normative or strategic objectives, and substantial criticism among everyone else. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 5:21 pm by Rachel Bercovitz, Todd Carney
Circuit had outlined these “demanding standards” in United States v. [read post]
10 Jul 2020, 7:24 am by Peter Shane
Where Kavanaugh and Gorsuch parted company with the majority was in their preference for applying the “demonstrated, specific need” standard of United States v. [read post]
7 Jul 2020, 2:52 pm by Lauren Moxley and Shane Rogers
United States, that the Fourth Amendment applies to cell phone company records that detail a cell phone user’s location and movements. [read post]
23 Jun 2020, 5:50 am by Kevin Kaufman
First, the principle that “similarly situated individuals [should] face similar tax burdens. [read post]
14 Jun 2020, 4:27 pm by INFORRM
National Security, Surveillance and Human Rights, R. [read post]