Search for: "Sharpe v. Department of Justice" Results 301 - 320 of 515
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
27 Sep 2011, 5:07 am
Automobile Insurance Company, 183 N.Y.S. 690, at 691, a case from Monroe County in 1920 that was affirmed by the Fourth Department; Accord Indian Chef v. [read post]
10 Feb 2019, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Canada In the case of Labourers’ International Union of North America, Local 183 v. [read post]
15 Apr 2024, 4:37 am by Peter J. Sluka
The Fourth Department Affirms In a one-line decision dated March 15, the Appellate Division, Fourth Department affirmed Justice Walker’s dismissal “for reasons stated at Supreme Court. [read post]
8 Jan 2017, 4:05 pm by INFORRM
Nationalist MP Jason Azzopardi said he will be filing libel proceedings against Justice Minister Owen Bonnici. [read post]
3 Oct 2011, 1:15 am by Melina Padron
Mahajna v Secretary of State for the Home Department [2011] EWHC 2481 (Admin) (30 September 2011) Detention of Israeli Arab activist Raed Salah Mahajna lawful save for 1.5 days when not told full reasons for detention. [read post]
26 Oct 2020, 7:42 am by Ngozi Ndulue
The Supreme Court granted the Department of Justice’s requests to vacate those injunctions, with 5-4 votes noted in two of the decisions. [read post]
20 Dec 2019, 8:49 am by Amy Howe
” March On March 26, the justices heard oral argument in the two partisan-gerrymandering cases, Rucho v. [read post]
18 Oct 2018, 10:42 am by Ronald Collins
Fletcher: The post-1936 view represents a sharp departure from early constitutional foreign affairs jurisprudence. [read post]
16 Oct 2013, 2:59 pm by Lyle Denniston
The Justices, rather than accepting for review any version of the question posed by the challengers, instead posed its own version, but in doing so borrowed almost exactly the language used by the Justice Department in a brief that summed up the issues raised in the case. [read post]
27 Nov 2011, 4:02 pm by INFORRM
The committee heard from The Sir Nicholas Wall P, Mr Justice Baker; Lord Neuberger MR and Mr Justice Tugendhat. [read post]
6 Nov 2009, 5:40 pm
Florida, being argued at 10, and Sullivan v. [read post]
5 Mar 2007, 11:27 pm
The answer, in a word, is federalism, and the New Haven story is an interesting although unintended consequence of the 1997 decision in Printz v. [read post]
1 Aug 2008, 4:29 pm
Sullivan, who has a reputation for being impatient with lawyers, is putting pressure on Justice Department attorneys to promptly work out ways for  lawyers representing  Guantanamo Bay detainees to have  greater access to the prisoners. [read post]
9 Feb 2015, 11:26 am by Dennis Crouch
IEEE sought and obtained clearance for the amendments from the Department of Justice, which issued a favorable Business Review Letter on February 2. [read post]