Search for: "Sharpe v. Light"
Results 301 - 320
of 754
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
2 Nov 2016, 5:13 am
This was accepted even in light of acknowledgments that ‘Article 377 cases rarely make it to court’, with the Tribunal considering instead abuses committed by police under the auspices of the law even absent formal prosecution. [read post]
17 Mar 2022, 10:34 am
Kwass v. [read post]
20 Oct 2015, 8:14 am
However, there were questions of fact on whether this reason was pretextual because other employees were not disciplined for using similar devices (Sharp v. [read post]
12 Jul 2010, 11:23 am
(US v. [read post]
27 Jun 2014, 6:08 am
Notably, that article cast Plaintiff is a favorable light. [read post]
1 Dec 2014, 12:36 am
Mercks clash over law governing coexistence dealThe Merck v Merck trade mark dispute (real name: Merck KGaA v Merck Sharp & Dohme Corp and others) has already appeared a couple of times on this weblog [see here and here], with the further honour to have a dedicated poll on who between the Germans and the Americans should have right to use that much-contended name. [read post]
16 May 2017, 7:30 am
However, the court then took a sharp turn away from Katyal’s position. [read post]
27 Sep 2011, 5:07 am
Vuksanaj v. [read post]
3 Apr 2022, 11:07 am
” Second, distance from her existing GP practice and support network in the Wokingham area which were necessary in light of her mental health issues. [read post]
1 Aug 2013, 6:00 am
American Express v. [read post]
16 Sep 2014, 6:24 am
Kienitz v. [read post]
6 Nov 2013, 10:40 am
The case discussed above in the context of recusals -- Resolution Chemicals v Lundbeck -- is one which, this Kat confidently predicts, will make the pages of Scientific American, New Scientist and plenty of other journals where the bright light of patent litigation rarely penetrates. [read post]
22 Aug 2014, 5:55 am
“Businesses strive to operate more efficiently in a climate of sharp increases in operating expenses such as electricity and water. [read post]
30 Oct 2016, 5:05 pm
On the same day Sharp LJ refused the application for permission to appeal in the case of Theedom v Nourish Training. [read post]
24 Jan 2017, 2:14 pm
I strongly maintain those views, but they now have to be read in the light of the contents of para 78 above in a case where the equality duty is engaged. [read post]
27 Apr 2024, 2:40 pm
In sharp contrast with Nixon v. [read post]
6 Mar 2015, 12:53 pm
Unsurprisingly, in light of the extensive history of disputes over arbitration ultimately resolved by the Texas Supreme Court, its decision in this case vindicates the health care provider's preference for arbitration over litigation. [read post]
2 Jun 2016, 6:55 am
Pohl on what exactly the defense’s position was with respect to defining non-legal mail, which included this light-hearted exchange: Col. [read post]
17 Apr 2010, 10:49 am
(Rottman v. [read post]
2 Jan 2020, 5:02 am
In State v. [read post]
