Search for: "Short v. Downs" Results 301 - 320 of 8,331
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
26 May 2023, 5:50 am by INFORRM
On 19 May 2023, Mrs Justice Heather Williams handed down judgment in Prismall v Google UK Limited & Another [2023] EWHC 1169 (KB). [read post]
2 Feb 2017, 8:45 am
And to get them struck down, we generally must show that the restriction imposes what the Supreme Court, in its 1992 decision in Planned Parenthood v. [read post]
26 Jun 2019, 9:05 pm by Walter Olson
Although the Supreme Court in yesterday’s case of Kisor v. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 8:46 am by Brian Cordery
Brian CorderyBristowsby Nicholas Round On 19 April 2016 Birss J handed down a short but notable judgment in the matter of EMGS v PGS. [read post]
1 Aug 2015, 11:02 am by Giles Peaker
The Upper Tribunal has another go at the separated families issue in CH 0062 2015-00 and this time, unsurprisingly, shuts down completely the FTT dissenting position in a Middlesborough FTT decision, while upholding and amplifying MR v North Tyneside. [read post]
1 Mar 2014, 1:19 pm by Dan Markel
 Seidman's got a cheeky and funny short reply to Waldron, entitled, appropriately enough, "Why Jeremy Waldron Really Agrees With Me." [read post]
30 May 2007, 11:48 pm
Even in a quieter Term, the Supreme Court's 5-3 decision in Watters v. [read post]
23 Jun 2009, 11:31 pm
By now, you should all know that the Supreme Court handed down their long-awaited decision in Northwest Austin Municipal Utility District No. 1 v. [read post]
23 Sep 2020, 11:35 pm by Florian Mueller
Huawei) involving different parties and patents fell short of the kind of derivation of the royalty demand that Huawei v. [read post]
25 Feb 2021, 3:04 pm by Phil Dixon
In short, no—mere speech will not support a conviction for RDO. [read post]
27 Nov 2023, 6:39 am by Ellena Erskine
The justices will hear oral argument in Brown v. [read post]
8 Mar 2024, 7:50 am by Ellena Erskine
Here’s the Friday morning read: Biden admonishes the Supreme Court for overturning Roe v. [read post]