Search for: "Short v. Jones" Results 301 - 320 of 1,093
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
20 Jul 2012, 8:15 am by Meir Feder
The following response in our symposium on Kiobel v. [read post]
27 Aug 2013, 7:30 am by Joy Waltemath
Finding that a former university dean failed to establish that he was fired because he followed the school’s sexual assault policy in investigating a student’s claims that she was sexually assaulted by two football players, the Iowa Supreme Court affirmed summary judgment on the dean’s wrongful discharge claim (Jones v University of Iowa, August 23, 2013, Zager, B). [read post]
16 Dec 2013, 5:40 am by Amy Howe
At Inter Alia, the online companion to the Yale Law and Policy Review, Brian Christopher Jones uses United States v. [read post]
20 May 2022, 6:39 am by John Elwood
The justices also granted review in Jones v. [read post]
19 Feb 2016, 10:05 am by Eric Goldman
district court ruling in Jones) This is inscrutable, and I have to imagine the court is thinking about facts it doesn’t explicitly reference in this short passage. [read post]
6 Apr 2010, 7:16 am by Jay Willis
Ashby Jones at the WSJ Law Blog and Warren Richey of the Christian Science Monitor cover the Court’s Monday decision to deny cert. in People of Bikini v. [read post]
24 Feb 2023, 9:54 am by Josh Blackman
On Wednesday, the Supreme Court decided Helix Energy Solutions Group, Inc. v. [read post]
22 Aug 2013, 4:31 pm by Dave Maass
For the full complaint: https://www.eff.org/document/lessig-v-liberation-music-complaint For Liberation Music's email to Prof. [read post]
16 Feb 2011, 11:47 am by Steve Bainbridge
Ashby Jones: The long-awaited battle between Air Products & Chemicals and Airgas is over. ... [read post]
5 Jun 2007, 6:43 am
Alden is a partner resident in the Cleveland office of Jones Day. [read post]
30 Nov 2018, 7:36 am by ASAD KHAN
The Supreme Court Lords Wilson, Carnwath, Hughes, Lloyd-Jones and Lady Black allowed the appeal. [read post]
13 Jan 2011, 2:08 am by gmlevine
This came after the same respondent had argued in two earlier cases, Dow Jones & Company, Inc. and Dow Jones LP v. [read post]