Search for: "Singh v. State"
Results 301 - 320
of 848
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
25 Nov 2016, 12:25 pm
The formation of a larger bench is a much-belated response to the request of a 5-judge bench of the Court in State of Uttar Pradesh v Jaibir Singh[3]for a larger bench for reconsideration of the BWSSB verdict. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
” In fact, the Union of India had in its submission in the Jaibir Singh case, referred to the absence of an alternative legal machinery as a reason for not bringing the amended definition into force. [read post]
In Defence of the Triple Test: A Case for Retaining the Standard in Bangalore Water Supply (Part-II)
25 Nov 2016, 12:23 pm
” In fact, the Union of India had in its submission in the Jaibir Singh case, referred to the absence of an alternative legal machinery as a reason for not bringing the amended definition into force. [read post]
22 Nov 2016, 3:30 am
United States, which in 1923 held that Bhaghat Singh Thind, “a high caste Hindu, of full Indian blood, born [in] India” was not “a white person” under the naturalization laws. [read post]
6 Nov 2016, 4:14 pm
The News Media Association has said there are “grounds for judicial review” of the decision to recognise Impress as a state-approved press regulator. [read post]
2 Nov 2016, 3:49 am
Yesterday’s argument in State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. [read post]
26 Oct 2016, 9:58 pm
It’s small, in light of his other issues, but Donald Trump is once again embroiled in litigation, albeit outside of the United States, which may result in findings against him of at least negligent misrepresentation sufficient to produce personal liability: see Singh v Trump et al, 2016 ONCA 747 (CanLII), <http://canlii.ca/t/gv3z7>. [read post]
24 Oct 2016, 9:30 pm
This Article seeks to address that question by examining two early twentieth-century cases involving the naturalization of Indian immigrants in the United States.In United States v. [read post]
11 Oct 2016, 9:50 am
In Singh v. [read post]
4 Oct 2016, 11:41 pm
It may be accepted under certain circumstances [See State of Haryana v. [read post]
2 Oct 2016, 4:32 pm
InFacts v Daily Express. [read post]
26 Sep 2016, 3:08 am
Citing Fedele v Seybert, 250 AD2d 519 [1st Dept 1998], and other Appellate Division cases, Justice Singh states that since Section 1104-a’s enactment, common-law dissolution claims have been sustained only in the most egregious circumstances, in which the majority was accused of systematic looting of corporate assets in flagrant disregard of the rights of the minority shareholders. [read post]
25 Sep 2016, 8:00 pm
However, in the decision Taylor-Baptiste v. [read post]
19 Sep 2016, 9:41 pm
The case for argument today is Georgia v. [read post]
14 Aug 2016, 9:18 pm
This imbalance was noticed by the Supreme Court in cases like State of West Bengal v. [read post]
8 Aug 2016, 6:00 am
Further he found that provided the SSHD applied the Hardial Singh principals, where a reasonableness test is applied to detention, then there was no need for specific custody time limits. [read post]
5 Aug 2016, 5:37 am
” Supported by the interveners – Bail for Immigration Detainees and Medical Justice – O successfully argued that the authority of R (Francis) v Secretary of State for the Home Department (Bail for Immigration Detainees intervening) [2014] EWCA Civ 718 had been wrongly decided. [read post]
25 Jul 2016, 2:05 am
Canada Rights body Sikhs For Justice (SFJ) has filed a defamation suit against Captain Amarinder Singh for linking the body to Pakistan’s ISI. [read post]
14 Jul 2016, 11:30 am
Singh v. [read post]
8 Jun 2016, 5:01 am
Allied was incorporated on August 23, 2001, by Sukhjeet Singh Gill. [read post]
