Search for: "Smith & Nephew Inc."
Results 301 - 320
of 353
Sort by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
10 Feb 2010, 11:28 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc. v. [read post]
4 Feb 2010, 8:11 am
Other newcomers included Safeway Inc., Discovery Communications Inc., Abertis Infraestructuras, Danske Bank A/S, and Osaka Gas Company. 18 companies have been on the list since its inception in 2005: NTT Docomo, SCA AB, Novo Nordisk, Alcoa, British Land Company, United Technologies, Fresenius Medical Care, Ricoh Company, FPL Group, Hewlett-Packard, Kuraray Company, Royal Bank of Canada, Diageo, SAP, Adidas, Swiss Reinsurance, Smith & Nephew, and Land… [read post]
31 Dec 2009, 11:46 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 482 F.3d 1187, 1193 (9th Cir. 2007), the plaintiff "ask[ed the court] to blindly accept the [product's] failure before her fracture healed as prima facie evidence that they were defective. [read post]
18 Nov 2009, 5:11 am
Citing another Bone Screw case (if the defendant was Sofamor, Danek, Smith Nephew, or Acromed, and the date is between 1995 and 2001 - chances are its a Bone Screw case), the court goes on to recognize that only "substantive violations" (your product didn't conform to the intended design) rather than "administrative violations" (failure to go through FDA procedures properly) could qualify as negligence per se under state law: [S]ince such… [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
8 Nov 2009, 7:44 pm
(IP finance) Gospel, gold diggers and gum trees: How sampling litigation changes the tune (IP Osgoode) Australia A mere collocation - Full Federal Court allows appeal against grant of interlocutory injunction preventing Smith & Nephew entering negative pressure wound therapy market: Smith & Nephew P/L v Wake Forest University Health Sciences (ipwars.com) The Vegemite/iSnack trade mark saga down under: Fiasco or triumph? [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 6:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]
26 Oct 2009, 5:25 am
Medico (Filewrapper) BPAI finds claim indefinite and not directed to patentable subject under Bilski: Ex parte Hemmat (GRAY On Claims) District Court N D Illinois: KSR obviousness does not require prior art from the same field: Se-Kure Controls, Inc v Diam USA, Inc (Chicago Intellectual Property Law Blog) District Court E D Texas finds plaintiff has standing; agreement transfers ownership and simultaneously a conditional purchase by transferor from transferee: Balsam Coffee… [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 410 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 410 F. [read post]
28 Sep 2009, 1:31 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 410 F. [read post]
24 Sep 2009, 5:09 am
Smith & Nephew, Inc., 410 F. [read post]
17 Sep 2009, 4:30 am
Medtronic, Inc., 128 S. [read post]
2 Sep 2009, 7:28 pm
I am always a bit humbled when a victim of food poisoning stands up to the corporations who poisoned them with food – especially food labeled “triple washed” and “ready to eat. [read post]
11 Aug 2009, 8:51 am
SOURCE Smith & Nephew Inc [read post]
24 Jul 2009, 11:22 pm
A press release on July 24 from patent challenger Smith & Nephew indicates that Kinetic Concepts [KCI] has won a round in the US re-examination fight but suggests outcomes have been different in other jurisdictions (countries):Smith & Nephew Inc.'s Advanced Wound Management division announced that the United States Patent and Trademark Office (Patent Office) has issued actions in re-examination proceedings involving three of the… [read post]
16 May 2009, 4:06 am
EEO/iNews from State CourtsiNews Related to Equal Employment Opportunity Source: iNews © 2009 John D. [read post]
7 May 2009, 6:08 am
Lowe's Home Centers Inc., 2009 WL 1010883 (6th Cir. [read post]
