Search for: "Smith v. Davis"
Results 301 - 320
of 763
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
9 Mar 2015, 8:15 am
Thanks to the Thomas More Society, for letting us represent them here, and to my students Tess Curet, Nathan Davis, and Michael Smith, who worked on the brief. [read post]
1 Aug 2022, 1:39 pm
Cooper v. [read post]
13 Oct 2009, 8:49 am
Steven Davis has nightmares about his family dying. [read post]
16 Jun 2011, 8:47 am
The first opinion was in Smith v. [read post]
22 Dec 2011, 3:00 am
Magistrate Judge Jerry Davis announces retirement. [read post]
10 Apr 2007, 1:18 am
Supreme Court case Atkins v. [read post]
9 Aug 2011, 4:16 am
Plaintiff's claim that had he not resigned, he may have been able to hide his fraudulent activities, [*4]continue to collect fees, and reach an agreement with OCM is purely speculative and does not raise a triable issue of fact (see AmBase Corp. v Davis Polk & Wardwell, 8 NY3d 428, 434-436 [2007]; GUS Consulting Gmb, 74 AD3d at 679; Phillips-Smith Speciality Retail Group II v Parker Chapin Flattau & Klimpl, 265 AD2d 208, 210 [1999], lv denied 94 NY2d… [read post]
1 Nov 2010, 7:13 am
The new case, Davis v. [read post]
21 Oct 2011, 8:08 am
In this week’s case (De Sousa v. [read post]
24 Sep 2019, 5:02 am
Brandon (Reed Smith LLP)). [read post]
1 Jul 2011, 12:22 am
" Smith v. [read post]
17 Jul 2011, 9:55 am
On Wednesday 20 July 2011, the Supreme Court will hand down judgment in R v Smith which was heard on 16 June 2011. [read post]
11 Jan 2010, 10:18 am
Supreme Court made getting such an injunction in a patent case extremely difficult with its landmark eBay v. [read post]
9 Dec 2013, 11:12 am
My students Tess Curet, Nathan Davis, and Michael Smith worked on the brief. [read post]
9 Dec 2019, 3:01 am
Smith — Again” [Joseph Davis, Becket/Federalist Society on certiorari petition in Ricks v. [read post]
19 May 2008, 7:09 am
The denied case was Smith v. [read post]
17 Sep 2018, 7:00 am
Based on Davies’ work, BYU Law Dean D. [read post]
20 Mar 2009, 2:05 am
Parke Davis & Co., 402 N.E.2d 194, 198-99 (Ill. 1980); Needham v. [read post]
16 Apr 2019, 2:00 am
Smith: The justices must decide what happens when the government fabricates evidence. [read post]
