Search for: "Smith v. General Services Administration" Results 301 - 320 of 752
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 Jun 2018, 5:29 pm by Richard A. Epstein
Smith is desperately wrong because it does not understand the need for making workable accommodations between general public laws and religious liberties. [read post]
25 May 2018, 4:15 am by Edith Roberts
” For the Associated Press, Mark Sherman and Jessica Gresko report that “at a recent event in Washington, [former solicitors general Justice Elena] Kagan and [Paul] Clement agreed new administrations should be sparing in changing their predecessors’ positions in pending Supreme Court cases. [read post]
6 May 2018, 8:35 pm by Lisa Milam-Perez
The Trump administration took the matter to the Supreme Court, arguing that the Ninth Circuit got it wrong. [read post]
1 May 2018, 4:37 am by Christopher J. Walker
Justice Clarence Thomas, writing for the Court in in Oil States Energy Services v. [read post]
17 Apr 2018, 11:43 am by William Ford
The Supreme Court declared U.S. v. [read post]
12 Mar 2018, 12:42 am by Kevin LaCroix
Our recent review of risk factor disclosure indicates that many public companies in industries that are particularly vulnerable to cybersecurity risks, such as financial services, technology and healthcare, have been disclosing cybersecurity risks with specific attention to the risks facing their particular businesses. [read post]
6 Mar 2018, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
Quoting a 2016 ruling, he acknowledged that a law that said “In Smith v. [read post]
3 Mar 2018, 10:17 am by William Ford
” In preparation for oral arguments in United States v. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 8:00 am by Andrew Keane Woods
Instead, we have been negotiating, first with the Obama Administration and now with the Trump Administration, a new Bilateral Agreement, for which the CLOUD Act would pave the way. [read post]
7 Feb 2018, 12:00 am by Public Employment Law Press
[Smith v Hager, 185 A.D.2d 612]Demoting an employee for sleeping on duty on two occasions, although a hearing officer found the employee’s supervisor had “condoned” such conduct and the hearing officer had recommended a suspension without pay for three weeks. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 3:02 am by NCC Staff
  But as Rehnquist later pointed out,  Marshall won three other major civil rights cases at the Court before Brown:  Smith v. [read post]