Search for: "Stables v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 734
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
23 May 2018, 12:34 am by Valerio De Stefano
In the Unites States, a federal judge followed the same line of reasoning in the case Razak v Uber when he decided that Uber drivers are independent contractors because they “work when they want to and are free to nap, run personal errands, or take smoke breaks between trips”. [read post]
11 May 2018, 1:25 pm by Gregory Forman
In his opening statement for his confirmation hearings to the United States Supreme Court, Chief Justice John Roberts stated, “Judges are like umpires. [read post]
26 Apr 2018, 11:52 am by Andrew Hamm
United States (Fourth Amendment, electronic privacy), and City of Hays, Kansas v. [read post]
4 Apr 2018, 6:20 am by Joy Waltemath
” But the court found this emphasis on business units misguided, given that the units were neither stable nor permanent, and the challenged performance evaluation processes did not occur on a unit-by-unit basis. 360 reviews, including quartiling, were the product of cross-unit collaboration, and division heads enforced quality control of ranking to be consistent with those reviews. [read post]
28 Mar 2018, 9:30 pm by Raphael Murillo
Although inspections are a remarkably recent development in the United States, they have a history that long predates the expansive regulatory state within which they now exist and the often-technical function they serve. [read post]
23 Feb 2018, 8:52 pm
  This approach is both profound and profoundly relevant to the actual state of contemporary regulatory governance in which states remain powerful but not the singular regulatory actors within the structures of global production. [read post]
18 Feb 2018, 10:36 am by Timothy Edgar
  The closest analogy for Mueller’s decision to charge the Russian trolls is probably the May 2014 indictment in United States v. [read post]
1 Feb 2018, 5:55 pm by Kevin LaCroix
Supreme Court has recently agreed to resolve this matter, in the case of Cyan, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Jan 2018, 1:02 pm by William Ford
United States or permitted by the court’s decision in Munaf v. [read post]
It rejected the Council’s claim that the County improperly piecemealed the CEQA analyses for each amendment, because, as stated in Banning Ranch Conservancy v. [read post]
2 Jan 2018, 5:08 pm by Kevin LaCroix
  As of December 29, 2017, the Senate has confirmed including 19 Trump administration judicial nominees, including one Associate Justice of the Supreme Court, 12 judges for the United States Courts of Appeals, and six judges for the United States District Courts. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 10:28 pm by Orin Kerr
I gather one consequence of my proposed approach would be that the Court would likely need to overturn United States v. [read post]
29 Dec 2017, 3:03 am by Orin Kerr
United States, the pending case on whether the Fourth Amendment protects cell-site records. [read post]