Search for: "Stand Up for California! v. California" Results 301 - 320 of 3,415
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
4 May 2015, 8:02 am by LTA-Editor
The companies argue that following the Ninth Circuit and granting Robins standing will open them up to a vast amount of liability. [read post]
18 May 2015, 11:59 am by Seyfarth Shaw LLP
California plaintiffs owe this special privilege to a 2014 California Supreme Court decision called Iskanian v. [read post]
19 Jul 2007, 4:00 pm
He was a tireless advocate and inspiration for all attorneys who stand up for the rights of employees. [read post]
27 Apr 2016, 5:30 am by Jeffrey Vlasek
For the employees of California forced to stand to perform their jobs, however, the California Supreme Court has given “have a seat” a refreshing new meaning. [read post]
3 Feb 2015, 7:26 am by Joy Waltemath
We wondered whether that decision would hold up in light of the subsequent California Supreme Court decision in Mendiola v. [read post]
31 Jul 2008, 9:04 pm
(Though even that is up to debate; after all, the former merely precludes state prosecution, and does not even attempt to alter the availability of potential federal prosecution.) [read post]
8 Nov 2015, 5:42 am by Nassiri Law
Businesses throughout California were up-in-arms about legislation that would have effectively prohibited employers from requiring signed arbitration agreements as an employment condition. [read post]
27 Feb 2012, 5:39 am by admin
State of California (1992) 4 Cal.4th 668, 680-681; see also California Teachers Assn. v. [read post]
22 Jun 2016, 8:00 am by Ilya Somin
Our brief is an unusual example of state governments standing up for property rights in the Supreme Court. [read post]
27 Apr 2022, 9:20 am by Eric Goldman
The Northern District of California reached the same conclusion in a similar case to this one, J.B. v. [read post]