Search for: "State v. Hunter" Results 301 - 320 of 1,257
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
16 May 2014, 8:58 am
” Now, anyone who knows anything about patent judges will know that they love experts who give their evidence in a moderate and balanced fashion and are willing to concede points where it is reasonable to do so – see for example Mr Justice Arnold’s comments about Professor Hunter in GUK v Yeda. [read post]
14 Mar 2014, 4:38 am
This confirms the common law requirement that the dwelling to be let must be in the condition fit for the purpose for which it is let when handed over to the tenant, and the landlord must maintain the premises in that condition (Viljoen v Cleaver 1945 NPD 332 at 336).The well-known case courts generally refer to is Hunter v Cumnor Investments 1952(1) SA 735 (C), which confirms the contract of lease principle in Roman-Dutch Law that the landlord is obliged to repair defects… [read post]
16 Nov 2012, 9:38 am by Bruce Khula
Supreme Court decisions that form the basis of the “political structure doctrine”: Hunter v. [read post]
13 Jul 2023, 4:54 pm by CoL .net
The application and reiteration of which was recently seen in Enka v Chubb and Kabab-ji v Kout Food Group. [read post]
22 Nov 2009, 5:23 pm by Brian Shiffrin
(See also its decision last year in People v Hunter, 11 NY3d 1 [2008], discussed here). [read post]
22 Apr 2014, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
The appeals court cited two Supreme Court precedents—the 1969 ruling in Hunter v. [read post]
9 Jun 2007, 3:28 pm
Instead it stated that "the present case involves a central issue of federal constitutional law, and although we abstain from ruling on issues of Texas constitutional law, see Railroad Commission v. [read post]
20 Nov 2012, 4:51 am by Heidi Henson
Supreme Court’s decisions in Washington v Seattle Sch Dist No 1 (1982) and Hunter v Erickson (1969), the appeals court found that Proposal 2 unconstitutionally altered Michigan’s political structure by impermissibly burdening racial minorities. [read post]
19 Feb 2012, 3:02 pm by Ilya Somin
However, as the Supreme Court recognized in the famous 1946 case of United States v. [read post]
10 Jan 2013, 12:44 pm by WIMS
But § 198c would clearly prevent the NPS from creating a scheme similar to a state-regulated hunt by, for example, selling tags to licensed hunters and allowing them to freely roam the park every autumn to shoot elk, even if the agency's reason for doing so was to reduce RMNP's elk population." [read post]