Search for: "State of Delaware v. Wells."
Results 301 - 320
of 2,036
Sorted by Relevance
|
Sort by Date
24 Jul 2022, 2:07 pm
In NVIDIA Corp. v. [read post]
19 Jan 2012, 2:50 pm
Microsoft Corp. v. [read post]
3 Feb 2009, 11:14 am
In Pfeffer v. [read post]
7 Apr 2008, 12:35 pm
(Here is a link to summaries on this blog of both the Chancery Court's decision in the foregoing case as well as a link to the Delaware Supreme Court's opinion affirming, as cited above.)He discusses the broader implications of the doctrine in the context of the "tug of war" between and among Delaware and the federal government--and other states--for preeminence in the governance of corporate law issues. [read post]
2 Mar 2012, 2:22 pm
The Delaware Supreme Court stated in Paramount Communications Inc. v. [read post]
28 Dec 2018, 1:00 pm
The court explained that it may consider the well-known principle announced in Schnell v. [read post]
4 Oct 2017, 6:24 am
In the recent decision of Mehta v. [read post]
7 Nov 2022, 8:38 am
They also believed that by picking Delaware law and Delaware courts to hear any dispute, their restrictive covenants would be upheld by a court that has a well-deserved reputation for enforcing contracts. [read post]
13 Jun 2018, 10:31 am
In a recent Delaware Court of Chancery decision in Edinburgh Holdings, Inc. v. [read post]
13 Aug 2023, 4:15 pm
Florida courts often look to Delaware courts due to the well developed body of Delaware corporate law. [read post]
20 Sep 2010, 5:00 am
Only under state law, a meeting with a group of shareholders that exceeds 5% may well trigger a poison pill, at least where the group comes to agreement on a common slate of nominees. [read post]
21 Jan 2009, 3:31 pm
In Mitchell v. [read post]
16 Oct 2009, 2:42 am
Total Holdings USA, Inc. v. [read post]
12 Sep 2012, 11:18 am
Forest Laboratories, (July 27, 2012) (what records must be disclosed in connection with a proxy contest); and Feeley v. [read post]
7 Jul 2011, 8:50 pm
Because Delaware is an at-will state, it is well established that an employer may terminate an employee for off-duty conduct. [read post]
29 Mar 2019, 3:00 am
Behold Winklevoss Capital Fund v. [read post]
7 Nov 2011, 12:01 pm
Burtch v. [read post]
11 May 2015, 5:41 pm
The Delaware Supreme Court may well disagree. [read post]
22 May 2009, 10:10 am
The violation is against the Securities Act of 1933 and Delaware law. [read post]
31 Jul 2016, 7:43 pm
In Aleynikov v. [read post]
