Search for: "State of Kansas v. United States" Results 301 - 320 of 1,399
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
5 Aug 2014, 6:30 am by Kyle Krull
However, the United States Supreme Court recently ruled to the contrary. [read post]
29 Sep 2015, 8:48 am by The Law Office of Philip D. Cave
Hennis is confined at the United States Disciplinary Barracks in Fort Leavenworth, Kansas (“USDB”). [read post]
16 Aug 2022, 4:45 pm by Lawrence Solum
  Here is the abstract: Following the leaked draft of the United States Supreme Court decision in Dobbs v. [read post]
15 Jan 2011, 7:31 am by JB
The act was struck down by a conservative Supreme Court majority in United States v. [read post]
17 Jan 2024, 2:25 pm by Daniel Barry
On January 2, 2024, the United States Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit (“Tenth Circuit”) denied the State of Oklahoma’s motion for a stay pending appeal to the United States Supreme Court and one week later transferred jurisdiction back to the district court[1] regarding Pharmaceutical Care Management Association v. [read post]
22 Apr 2023, 7:16 pm
 This is very much in evidence in the United States ("The ESG Wars": Presentation of the University of Dundee (Scotland)). [read post]
7 Oct 2019, 4:02 am by Edith Roberts
” The third case granted on Friday was United States v. [read post]
13 Sep 2012, 3:01 pm by The JAG HUNTER
Wong Kim Ark (which was citing U.S. v Rhodes, noting that one could only be a British subject or a natural-born citizen, and not hold both citizenships): All persons born in the allegiance of the King are natural-born subjects, and all persons born in the allegiance of the United States are natural-born citizens.” LINK [read post]
9 Aug 2013, 5:56 am by Beth Graham
Drahozal, University of Kansas School of Law, have authored a paper that uses empirical evidence to examine the effect the United States Supreme Court’s decision in AT&T Mobility LLC v. [read post]
6 Aug 2019, 9:08 pm by Dan Flynn
As in the case of transfer, under the Supreme Court’s decision in Immigration & Naturalization Service v. [read post]
6 Apr 2015, 1:59 pm by Jon Ibanez
“We are acutely aware the statute in question attempts to address the terrible toll impaired drivers inflict on our state’s highways, but we are reminded of the ‘truism that constitutional protections have costs,’” said the Declerck court citing the United State Supreme Court ‘s decision in Coy v. [read post]