Search for: "State of New York v Robert V." Results 301 - 320 of 4,654
Sort by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
28 Feb 2023, 6:52 pm by Ilya Somin
New York, the 2019 case challenging the legality of the Trump Administration's plans for the 2020 census, on the basis that "undercounting the state's population "would have potential effects to the State of New York in the term—in terms of the benefits it might later receive, that kind of knock-on effect was sufficient to constitute standing in that case. [read post]
27 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by Michael C. Dorf
True, the New York Constitution’s search-and-seizure provision is (as relevant here) worded identically to the federal Fourth Amendment, but the New York Court of Appeals, as the final arbiter of the meaning of New York State law, is free to construe (and has construed) the state constitutional provision to provide greater protection than the U.S. [read post]
19 Feb 2023, 9:23 pm by Josh Blackman
Hakeem Jeffries of New York) who each week holds a news conference to slam the most extreme rulings by GOP judges. [read post]
13 Feb 2023, 9:59 am by David Kopel
This post lists all the sources cited by the majority opinion in New York State Rifle & Pistol Association v. [read post]
2 Feb 2023, 6:30 am by John Mikhail
In 1967, Harvard’s Robert Green McCloskey took a major step forward when he published a new edition of The Works of James Wilson (first published in 1804 by Wilson’s son, Bird Wilson), along with a lengthy introduction, bibliographical essay, and detailed index. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 9:01 pm by renholding
Before 1929, all securities markets in the United States were private and thus, dark. [read post]
1 Feb 2023, 12:00 am by Jonathan Ross (Bristows)
  The House of Lords in SAAMCo v York Montague set out the principle that a wrongdoer is unlikely to be liable for all the consequences of their actions unless justified by special policy. [read post]
30 Jan 2023, 7:24 pm by John Floyd
For example, an article in The New York Times states that over 10,000 court verdicts are under review in Denmark due to the Danish authorities’ improper analysis of cellular call detail records. [read post]
26 Jan 2023, 7:45 pm by Jim Sedor
Supreme Court said it cannot identify the person who in the spring leaked a draft of the opinion that overturned Roe v. [read post]
24 Jan 2023, 8:00 am by Guest Blogger
One part of my Foreword is an investigation into the role of race in two of the Court’s biggest cases last Term—New York State Rifle and Pistol Association v. [read post]
23 Jan 2023, 4:34 pm by centerforartlaw
To conclude, Passman stated that the decision to choose a trust ultimately comes down to the artist’s goals. [read post]
19 Jan 2023, 7:15 am by Eugene Volokh
Demetriades appeals from orders of the Committee on Grievances of the Board of Judges of the United States District Court for the Eastern District of New York (the "Committee") finding her liable for violating various provisions of the New York Rules of Professional Conduct and imposing sanctions for these violations, including a six-month suspension from practicing law in the Eastern District. [read post]
8 Jan 2023, 7:35 am
”[2]For Marxist-Leninist and many post-colonial states, it is described as “Building a Community with a Shared Future for Mankind and Global Human Rights Governance. [read post]
4 Jan 2023, 5:57 am by Matthew L.M. Fletcher
Reuben Clark Law School The Reports of My Death Are Greatly Exaggerated: The Continued Vitality of Worcester v. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 6:30 am by Guest Blogger
Women could vote in New Jersey and free Blacks voted on the same basis as Whites in Massachusetts, New Hampshire, New York, New Jersey, Pennsylvania, and North Carolina, and probably in Connecticut and Maryland was well.[5]  In the fall of 1788, the eleven ratifying states elected Representative and Senators, and voted for the new president. [read post]
3 Jan 2023, 5:00 am by Timothy Bonis
The Court reinforced that ruling in Hawker v New York (1898), where Justice Brewer wrote in his majority opinion that “it cannot be doubted that the legislature has authority, in the exercise of its general police power, to…bar from admission to [the medical profession] dishonorable men,” giving states not only the power to license physicians but broad discretion in the process. [read post]