Search for: "State of Texas v. EPA" Results 301 - 320 of 418
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
30 Jun 2007, 1:21 pm
EPA decision (especially for its discussion on standing); (ii) the four Texas death-penalty cases that Greenhouse discusses, demonstrating that "the state and federal courts" in Texas "remain to the right of the Supreme Court" -- to the right of a 5-4 majority, anyway; and (iii) Executive war powers, where yesterday's stunning grant of the petition on a motion to rehear in Boumediene suggests that at least in this one area, Justice Kennedy… [read post]
27 Jun 2024, 9:05 pm by Matthew Chagares
The majority applied the Court’s recent New York State Rifle & Pistol Association, Inc. v. [read post]
24 Sep 2013, 7:05 pm by Mary Dwyer
§ 7410’s express limit on the EPA’s disapproval authority and decisions of other courts of appeals, the EPA may substitute its own policy preferences for a state’s about the appropriate means of controlling air pollution within that state, without identifying any applicable “requirement of th[e] [Clean Air Act]” with which the state’s chosen means would interfere; and (2) whether the panel erred under SEC… [read post]
14 Oct 2021, 11:08 am by John Elwood
Texas (Ysleta I) correctly subjects the Pueblo to all Texas gaming regulations. [read post]
7 Jul 2023, 9:05 pm by Julia Englebert
Texas A&M Law School professor Daniel E. [read post]
1 Mar 2023, 4:23 pm by Guest Author
This discussion at oral argument was a reprise of SG Prelogar’s argument in United States v. [read post]
15 Nov 2010, 11:44 am by Jack McNeill, Associate Library Director
Application of the remedial purpose canon to CERCLA successor liability issues after United States v. [read post]
13 Mar 2015, 10:47 am by John Elwood
On cert., the state asks (1) whether the Michigan courts’ decision not to extend United States v. [read post]
2 Mar 2017, 9:30 pm by Justin Daniel
Department of Justice (DOJ), which is currently involved in litigation with Texas over that state’s voter identification law, made a motion to drop the argument that Texas enacted the law with discriminatory intent—something that it is necessary for opponents of the law to prove if they wish to see a judge place Texas back under “preclearance” under the Voting Rights Act, and require the state to have any changes it made to its… [read post]
25 Aug 2022, 9:03 pm by Bryn Hines
The guidance, issued in the aftermath of the Dobbs v. [read post]
3 Jul 2015, 5:54 am by Amy Howe
Commentary on the Court’s decision in Texas Department of Housing and Community Affairs v. [read post]
11 Mar 2016, 10:02 am by John Elwood
He contends that the two states have not shown that Colorado caused them a direct injury analogous to a casus belli were the states sovereign (quiet there, Texas). [read post]
26 Apr 2012, 2:45 am
 The Eastern District of Texas says "maybe," according to a post about a recent ruling in a patent case, Hill v. [read post]