Search for: "State v Hole" Results 301 - 320 of 1,887
Sorted by Relevance | Sort by Date
RSS Subscribe: 20 results | 100 results
10 Feb 2010, 3:17 pm
Given what the doctrine says -- both the categorical approach as well as the expansive state law doctrine of indecent exposure -- why didn't the government introduce evidence that satisfied the modified approach and proved that Nunez was convicted (as I'm sure he was) of a true moral turpitude offense rather than due to his appearance on "Boys Gone Wild" or on one side of a glory hole?! [read post]
24 May 2010, 4:04 am by admin
  On February 11, 2010, the Court of Appeals ruled in the case of Gallagher v. [read post]
14 Aug 2007, 3:06 pm
On Wednesday, secret documents that purportedly chronicle parts of the governments' secret warrantless spying on Americans' communications will collide with the government's most powerful legal tool -- the state secrets privilege -- whose invocation virtually forces judges to disappear lawsuits into the memory hole once the government says a lawsuit involves national security. [read post]
13 Jun 2024, 5:01 am by Eugene Volokh
Part of Young's work involved evacuating Afghan citizens during the United States withdrawal from Afghanistan. [read post]
27 Feb 2009, 9:36 am
In particular, the court focused on a distinction that it had drawn in an earlier case, United States v. [read post]